Guidelines for Diagnosis of Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss and Their Specificity

The MLC guidelines demonstrate poorer specificity than previous guidelines. Medical experts should be aware of their poor specificity and consequential likelihood of false-positive diagnoses of NIHL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Otolaryngology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for Diagnosis of Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss and Their Specificity

Kevin Green, John de Carpentier, Mark E. Lutman
1 citations
Clinical Otolaryngology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
0.34
article

Guidelines for Diagnosis of Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss and Their Specificity

Kevin Green, John de Carpentier, Mark E. Lutman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The MLC guidelines demonstrate poorer specificity than previous guidelines. Medical experts should be aware of their poor specificity and consequential likelihood of false-positive diagnoses of NIHL.

Clinical OtolaryngologyVol. 50(3)
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.