AI ethics unwrapped: an empirical investigation of ethical principles in collaborative ideation processes

Abstract Motivated by ongoing criticism of the practical operationalization of ethical principles in artificial intelligence (AI) development, this study targets the ethical practice of AI developers in Germany. We focus on design as a key technological practice and developers as designers of AI-based systems when we investigate the socially, historically, and contextually influenced practice of AI ethics in the design process. We embed our methodology in value sensitive design (VSD), conduct design thinking workshops prototyping AI tools for hypothetical use cases, and ground our analysis on established ethical guidelines for AI. The results of this study reveal not only awareness of ethical principles in developers, more importantly, a strong influence of ethics on design decisions. Developers adapt their designs with technical interventions in favor of those using and being affected by their solutions. Our contribution is threefold: we establish a fine-grained categorization system of ethical principles based on AI ethics guidelines and VSD. We corroborate previous empirical research examining the prompted and self-reported influence and prioritization of ethical principles. Finally, we synthesize our findings with tangible design recommendations for AI ethics by design. We focus on recommendations for human involvement, privacy, and non-discrimination: encourage participatory AI design and avoid end-to-end automation in cases where humans are impacted; empower developers to integrate technical interventions from the onset of the design process to establish AI privacy by design; and support developers in emphasizing non-discriminatory AI, especially in contexts historically associated with discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00638-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI ethics unwrapped: an empirical investigation of ethical principles in collaborative ideation processes

Christina Cociancig, Andreas Breiter, Hendrik Heuer
1 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

AI ethics unwrapped: an empirical investigation of ethical principles in collaborative ideation processes

Christina Cociancig, Andreas Breiter, Hendrik Heuer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Motivated by ongoing criticism of the practical operationalization of ethical principles in artificial intelligence (AI) development, this study targets the ethical practice of AI developers in Germany. We focus on design as a key technological practice and developers as designers of AI-based systems when we investigate the socially, historically, and contextually influenced practice of AI ethics in the design process. We embed our methodology in value sensitive design (VSD), conduct design thinking workshops prototyping AI tools for hypothetical use cases, and ground our analysis on established ethical guidelines for AI. The results of this study reveal not only awareness of ethical principles in developers, more importantly, a strong influence of ethics on design decisions. Developers adapt their designs with technical interventions in favor of those using and being affected by their solutions. Our contribution is threefold: we establish a fine-grained categorization system of ethical principles based on AI ethics guidelines and VSD. We corroborate previous empirical research examining the prompted and self-reported influence and prioritization of ethical principles. Finally, we synthesize our findings with tangible design recommendations for AI ethics by design. We focus on recommendations for human involvement, privacy, and non-discrimination: encourage participatory AI design and avoid end-to-end automation in cases where humans are impacted; empower developers to integrate technical interventions from the onset of the design process to establish AI privacy by design; and support developers in emphasizing non-discriminatory AI, especially in contexts historically associated with discrimination.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(3)
University of Wuppertal (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Center for Advanced Internet Studies (DE)
Universität Bremen
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.