Measurements of the flux densities and variability of the standard flux scale ''Artificial Moon'' sources on time scales of 1-8.5 years

We present flux density measurements for the standard radio sources of the ``Artificial Moon'' (AM) absolute flux scale during the time interval of 2017.5–2024.0 at wavelengths $\lambda=3.5$ and $6.2$ cm. The standard sources are weakly variable, and maintaining the accuracy of the scale requires regularly recurring calibrations. Currently, the RT-32 radio telescope at the Svetloe Observatory of the Institute of Applied Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS) monitors the AM flux scale standard sources to study their variability and maintain the accuracy of the scale. We determined the flux densities of the AM flux scale calibrators at two wavelengths during the time interval of 2017.5–2024.0. The measurement errors for both wavelengths did not exceed $\pm2$%, the measurement data were averaged over time intervals of 1 year at the average epochs 2019.0, 2022.0, and 2023.0. A comparison of the standard source flux densities $S$ for the epochs 2019.0, 2022.0, and 2023.0 with each other as well as with the flux densities $S_0$ at the epoch 2015.5 has shown that at time intervals of more than 1 year, there exists variation in the standard source flux densities that exceeds the standard deviations $\sigma$ and the established flux scale error limits of $\pm3$%. We conclude that it is necessary to recalibrate the standard sources at least every 2 years to maintain the accuracy of the flux scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26119/vak2024.167
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurements of the flux densities and variability of the standard flux scale ''Artificial Moon'' sources on time scales of 1-8.5 years

T. Andreeva, В. Д. Иванов, I. A. Rakhimov, А. В. Ипатов
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Measurements of the flux densities and variability of the standard flux scale ''Artificial Moon'' sources on time scales of 1-8.5 years

T. Andreeva, В. Д. Иванов, I. A. Rakhimov, А. В. Ипатов
article en

Abstract

We present flux density measurements for the standard radio sources of the ``Artificial Moon'' (AM) absolute flux scale during the time interval of 2017.5–2024.0 at wavelengths $\lambda=3.5$ and $6.2$ cm. The standard sources are weakly variable, and maintaining the accuracy of the scale requires regularly recurring calibrations. Currently, the RT-32 radio telescope at the Svetloe Observatory of the Institute of Applied Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS) monitors the AM flux scale standard sources to study their variability and maintain the accuracy of the scale. We determined the flux densities of the AM flux scale calibrators at two wavelengths during the time interval of 2017.5–2024.0. The measurement errors for both wavelengths did not exceed $\pm2$%, the measurement data were averaged over time intervals of 1 year at the average epochs 2019.0, 2022.0, and 2023.0. A comparison of the standard source flux densities $S$ for the epochs 2019.0, 2022.0, and 2023.0 with each other as well as with the flux densities $S_0$ at the epoch 2015.5 has shown that at time intervals of more than 1 year, there exists variation in the standard source flux densities that exceeds the standard deviations $\sigma$ and the established flux scale error limits of $\pm3$%. We conclude that it is necessary to recalibrate the standard sources at least every 2 years to maintain the accuracy of the flux scale.

Institute of Applied Astronomy (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.