A framework for modeling carbon loss from rivers following terrestrial enhanced weathering

Abstract Enhanced weathering (EW) has garnered increasing interest as a promising technique for durable carbon dioxide removal, with a range of potential co-benefits including increased soil pH and nutrient availability. However, the potential loss of initially captured CO 2 during river transport remains poorly constrained, undermining the use of this practice as a carbon mitigation strategy. Here, we present results from a first-of-its-kind dynamic river network (DRN) model designed to quantify the impact of EW on river carbonate chemistry in North American watersheds. We map key water quality parameters using machine learning and use a DRN model to simulate changes in carbon degassing during EW. Our model predicts low carbon loss (<5%) from river networks for many of the river pathways explored here, but significantly higher (>15%) carbon degassing is also observed, indicating that riverine carbon storage and the impacts of EW on river chemistry must be evaluated in a deployment-specific or regional context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada398
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for modeling carbon loss from rivers following terrestrial enhanced weathering

Yoshiki Kanzaki, Shaoda Liu, Noah J. Planavsky, Christopher T. Reinhard et al.
9 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.81
article

A framework for modeling carbon loss from rivers following terrestrial enhanced weathering

Yoshiki Kanzaki, Shaoda Liu, Noah J. Planavsky, Christopher T. Reinhard, Shuang Zhang
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Enhanced weathering (EW) has garnered increasing interest as a promising technique for durable carbon dioxide removal, with a range of potential co-benefits including increased soil pH and nutrient availability. However, the potential loss of initially captured CO 2 during river transport remains poorly constrained, undermining the use of this practice as a carbon mitigation strategy. Here, we present results from a first-of-its-kind dynamic river network (DRN) model designed to quantify the impact of EW on river carbonate chemistry in North American watersheds. We map key water quality parameters using machine learning and use a DRN model to simulate changes in carbon degassing during EW. Our model predicts low carbon loss (<5%) from river networks for many of the river pathways explored here, but significantly higher (>15%) carbon degassing is also observed, indicating that riverine carbon storage and the impacts of EW on river chemistry must be evaluated in a deployment-specific or regional context.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(2)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Beijing Normal University (CN), Yale University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Yale University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Texas A and M University, Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, High Performance Research Computing, Texas A and M University
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.