What Deserve Studying the Most? A Q‐Methodology Approach to Explore Stakeholders' Perspectives on Research Priorities in <scp>GenAI</scp> ‐Supported Second Language Education

ABSTRACT Recently, there has been a significant increase in research on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the domain of second language (L2) education. Given the limited resources, it is essential for GenAI research to focus on key areas. However, there is still uncertainty about which topics should be prioritised. Research priorities are often shaped by individual researchers' personal interests, which can skew the focus of many studies. Additionally, stakeholder perspectives on these topics can vary widely. Therefore, this study employs the Q methodology to reveal the consensus among different stakeholder groups. To this end, a total of 19 participants, including six researchers, six teachers and seven students, engaged in a Q‐sort exercise involving 34 statements. Through KADE software, the subsequent Centroid Factor Analysis and varimax rotation were used to extract patterns. The analysis revealed three common perspectives across stakeholder groups: psychological factors of teachers and students, multiple scenarios of measurement and the improvement of L2 competence. These findings provide valuable insights that can inform and refine research agendas in GenAI for L2 education, optimising the allocation of resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12898
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Deserve Studying the Most? A Q‐Methodology Approach to Explore Stakeholders' Perspectives on Research Priorities in GenAI ‐Supported Second Language Education

Ziwen Pan
26 citations
European Journal of Education
Q Methodology Applications
12.75
article

What Deserve Studying the Most? A Q‐Methodology Approach to Explore Stakeholders' Perspectives on Research Priorities in GenAI ‐Supported Second Language Education

Ziwen Pan
article en
26 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recently, there has been a significant increase in research on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the domain of second language (L2) education. Given the limited resources, it is essential for GenAI research to focus on key areas. However, there is still uncertainty about which topics should be prioritised. Research priorities are often shaped by individual researchers' personal interests, which can skew the focus of many studies. Additionally, stakeholder perspectives on these topics can vary widely. Therefore, this study employs the Q methodology to reveal the consensus among different stakeholder groups. To this end, a total of 19 participants, including six researchers, six teachers and seven students, engaged in a Q‐sort exercise involving 34 statements. Through KADE software, the subsequent Centroid Factor Analysis and varimax rotation were used to extract patterns. The analysis revealed three common perspectives across stakeholder groups: psychological factors of teachers and students, multiple scenarios of measurement and the improvement of L2 competence. These findings provide valuable insights that can inform and refine research agendas in GenAI for L2 education, optimising the allocation of resources.

European Journal of EducationVol. 60(1)
Hunan Normal University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Changsha Normal University (CN)
Hunan Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Q Methodology Applications
12.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.