Caught in the middle? Comparing disability payment restructuring and workfare in Denmark and Australia

This article engages in a dynamic cross-national comparison of neoliberal restructuring in Denmark and Australia in relation to tightened eligibility to disability related income payments and workfare policies which have compelled people with disability into the labour force. Both jurisdictions share characteristics in using work capacity, as assessed by administrative ‘expertise’, to limit eligibility for disability pensions, and divert people into the labour force. However, they differ in the relative generosity of conditions of income support, as well as heterogenous approaches to supporting the development of employment opportunities. We argue that these observed differences conform to Esping-Andersen’s classic understanding of the social democratic versus liberal welfare states. Import­antly, however, we note both jurisdictions share a common history of austerity in relation to their disability pension schemes, with many people with disability at risk of being ‘caught in the middle’ between lacking opportunities for employment participation and limited social protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2024.2439972
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caught in the middle? Comparing disability payment restructuring and workfare in Denmark and Australia

Natasja Koitzsch Jensen, Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel, Gyu‐Jin Hwang
Disability & Society
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Caught in the middle? Comparing disability payment restructuring and workfare in Denmark and Australia

Natasja Koitzsch Jensen, Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel, Gyu‐Jin Hwang
article en

Abstract

This article engages in a dynamic cross-national comparison of neoliberal restructuring in Denmark and Australia in relation to tightened eligibility to disability related income payments and workfare policies which have compelled people with disability into the labour force. Both jurisdictions share characteristics in using work capacity, as assessed by administrative ‘expertise’, to limit eligibility for disability pensions, and divert people into the labour force. However, they differ in the relative generosity of conditions of income support, as well as heterogenous approaches to supporting the development of employment opportunities. We argue that these observed differences conform to Esping-Andersen’s classic understanding of the social democratic versus liberal welfare states. Import­antly, however, we note both jurisdictions share a common history of austerity in relation to their disability pension schemes, with many people with disability at risk of being ‘caught in the middle’ between lacking opportunities for employment participation and limited social protection.

Disability & SocietyVol. 40(9)
Australian Institute of Criminology (AU), University of Copenhagen (DK), The University of Sydney (AU), Institute of Criminology (SI)
Lundbeckfonden
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Caught in the middle? Comparing disability payment restructuring and workfare in Denmark and Australia — Natasja Koitzsch Jensen, Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel, et al. · Disability & Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS