Identifying Grammatical Errors and Mistakes via a Written Learner Corpus in a Foreign Language Context

Foreign language learners of English have difficulty in applying grammar rules in writing despite prolonged training focusing on grammar. This corpus-driven error analysis study examines English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ grammatical errors through a written learner corpus, which contains essays written by Level 2 and 3 students in a language program at a state university. The study also aims to reveal whether they make any improvement within a term. Using James’s (1998) taxonomy of errors, the data were analyzed via a corpus tool, “AntConc”. The results of descriptive analysis for error frequency showed that the most common grammatical errors were of verb conjugation, prepositions, articles, grammatical numbers, and voice, respectively. The study also showed no significant progress for Level 2 learners while Level 3 learners slightly improved by rectifying the number of errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language Research
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.1553484
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Grammatical Errors and Mistakes via a Written Learner Corpus in a Foreign Language Context

Merve Gazioğlu, Selami Aydın
1 citations
Journal of Language Research
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
0.79
article

Identifying Grammatical Errors and Mistakes via a Written Learner Corpus in a Foreign Language Context

Merve Gazioğlu, Selami Aydın
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Foreign language learners of English have difficulty in applying grammar rules in writing despite prolonged training focusing on grammar. This corpus-driven error analysis study examines English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ grammatical errors through a written learner corpus, which contains essays written by Level 2 and 3 students in a language program at a state university. The study also aims to reveal whether they make any improvement within a term. Using James’s (1998) taxonomy of errors, the data were analyzed via a corpus tool, “AntConc”. The results of descriptive analysis for error frequency showed that the most common grammatical errors were of verb conjugation, prepositions, articles, grammatical numbers, and voice, respectively. The study also showed no significant progress for Level 2 learners while Level 3 learners slightly improved by rectifying the number of errors.

Journal of Language ResearchVol. 8(2)
Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR), Abdullah Gül University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.