Effects of Integrated Virtual Reality and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Standing Balance

Background/Objectives: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) integrated into virtual reality (VR) environments enhances immersion and mitigates cybersickness. It is well known that GVS can affect standing balance. Most studies have investigated the effects of GVS in VR in seated conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of joint GVS and VR with moving visual stimulus on standing balance. Methods: Using a repeated measures counter-balanced design, motion sickness, postural sway, and velocity utilizing the center of pressure (COP) along the mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) axes were obtained in 18 subjects during optokinetic (OPK) stimulus (black and white vertical bars moving from left to the right) in VR across three interventions: GVS in the same direction of visual stimulus—left to right ear (Positive GVS), GVS in the opposite direction of visual stimulus—right to left ear (Negative GVS), and without GVS (Null GVS). Motion sickness symptom scoring was obtained using the Pensacola Diagnostic Index. Results: The PDI score was increased significantly in the Negative GVS. The root mean square and sway range of COP along ML was greater during the Positive GVS and Negative GVS than the Null GVS, while, along AP, it was only greater during Negative GVS. During Positive GVS, mean positive and negative peak velocities, only in ML, were increased and decreased, respectively. During Negative GVS, only negative peak velocities in both ML and AP directions were decreased. Conclusions: This research highlights the importance of testing combined VR and GVS to assess standing balance while mitigating cybersickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Hearing and Balance Medicine
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm6010001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Integrated Virtual Reality and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Standing Balance

Michael J. Cevette, Gaurav N. Pradhan, Jan Stepánek, Sarah E. Kingsbury
1 citations
Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Hearing and Balance Medicine
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
0.37
article

Effects of Integrated Virtual Reality and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Standing Balance

Michael J. Cevette, Gaurav N. Pradhan, Jan Stepánek, Sarah E. Kingsbury
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) integrated into virtual reality (VR) environments enhances immersion and mitigates cybersickness. It is well known that GVS can affect standing balance. Most studies have investigated the effects of GVS in VR in seated conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of joint GVS and VR with moving visual stimulus on standing balance. Methods: Using a repeated measures counter-balanced design, motion sickness, postural sway, and velocity utilizing the center of pressure (COP) along the mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) axes were obtained in 18 subjects during optokinetic (OPK) stimulus (black and white vertical bars moving from left to the right) in VR across three interventions: GVS in the same direction of visual stimulus—left to right ear (Positive GVS), GVS in the opposite direction of visual stimulus—right to left ear (Negative GVS), and without GVS (Null GVS). Motion sickness symptom scoring was obtained using the Pensacola Diagnostic Index. Results: The PDI score was increased significantly in the Negative GVS. The root mean square and sway range of COP along ML was greater during the Positive GVS and Negative GVS than the Null GVS, while, along AP, it was only greater during Negative GVS. During Positive GVS, mean positive and negative peak velocities, only in ML, were increased and decreased, respectively. During Negative GVS, only negative peak velocities in both ML and AP directions were decreased. Conclusions: This research highlights the importance of testing combined VR and GVS to assess standing balance while mitigating cybersickness.

Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Hearing and Balance MedicineVol. 6(1)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.