Linking Error Estimation in Stocking–Lord Linking

Stocking–Lord (SL) linking is a widely used linking method based on item response theory (IRT). This article examines the variability in SL linking parameter estimates within the two-parameter logistic (2PL) model. The uncertainty in SL linking arises from the sampling variability (standard error) and item selection (linking error), which can induce variability due to random differential item functioning (DIF). Three linking error estimation approaches are compared in this paper: the conventional jackknife linking error method, a newly developed approximate jackknife linking error method, and a Taylor approximation-based estimate. Simulation studies showed that the approximate jackknife method closely aligns with the traditional jackknife linking error method and outperforms the linking error estimation approach based on Taylor approximation. The adequacy of coverage rates for SL linking parameter estimates was also assessed using estimates of the total error. Results from a simulation study demonstrate that the bias-corrected total error provides superior coverage rates compared to both the conventional total error and the standard error, which does not account for item-related uncertainty due to random DIF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations5010002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking Error Estimation in Stocking–Lord Linking

Alexander Robitzsch
1 citations
Foundations
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
0.44
article

Linking Error Estimation in Stocking–Lord Linking

Alexander Robitzsch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Stocking–Lord (SL) linking is a widely used linking method based on item response theory (IRT). This article examines the variability in SL linking parameter estimates within the two-parameter logistic (2PL) model. The uncertainty in SL linking arises from the sampling variability (standard error) and item selection (linking error), which can induce variability due to random differential item functioning (DIF). Three linking error estimation approaches are compared in this paper: the conventional jackknife linking error method, a newly developed approximate jackknife linking error method, and a Taylor approximation-based estimate. Simulation studies showed that the approximate jackknife method closely aligns with the traditional jackknife linking error method and outperforms the linking error estimation approach based on Taylor approximation. The adequacy of coverage rates for SL linking parameter estimates was also assessed using estimates of the total error. Results from a simulation study demonstrate that the bias-corrected total error provides superior coverage rates compared to both the conventional total error and the standard error, which does not account for item-related uncertainty due to random DIF.

FoundationsVol. 5(1)
Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.