Net Promoter Score as a Reflection of Patients’ Opinions About Telemedical Visits: A Mixed Methods Analysis

<b>Introduction:</b> In order to assess patient experiences of telemedicine, researchers and administrators use the net promoter score (NPS), based on a likelihood to recommend (LTR) question. However, there is reason to doubt validity of this metric for this purpose. We assessed the degree to which the LTR question reflects actual patient preferences about telemedicine. <b>Methods:</b> Using data from a patient experience survey collected in Spring 2020, we compared LTR responses to open comments. Through content analysis, we transformed comments into categorical variables and used those variables in a multiple logistic regression model to predict LTR responses. We also thematically analyzed comments to further elucidate our results. <b>Results:</b> Only about half the comments mentioned telemedicine at all. Around 6% of comments were wholly incongruent with LTR responses. In many comments, ideas about telemedicine were semantically entangled with ideas about providers. Our logistic regression found strong associations between sentiments expressed in comments and LTR responses. However, comments about telemedicine were relatively poor predictors for LTR compared to comments about the provider. <b>Discussion:</b> NPS, which is included on many patient experience surveys used by health systems across the United States, has limitations for use as a measure of the acceptability of telemedicine for patients. Patients have more than telemedicine in mind when responding to the LTR question, and ratings conflate attitudes about providers, office policies, and staff with the telemedicine modality. More direct measures are necessary for meaningful research on the acceptability and usability of telemedicine for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0300
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Net Promoter Score as a Reflection of Patients’ Opinions About Telemedical Visits: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Mike Kohut, Rachel Alfiero, John DiPalazzo, Eric Anderson et al.
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Net Promoter Score as a Reflection of Patients’ Opinions About Telemedical Visits: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Mike Kohut, Rachel Alfiero, John DiPalazzo, Eric Anderson, Jasmine Bishop, Tracy Jalbuena
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> In order to assess patient experiences of telemedicine, researchers and administrators use the net promoter score (NPS), based on a likelihood to recommend (LTR) question. However, there is reason to doubt validity of this metric for this purpose. We assessed the degree to which the LTR question reflects actual patient preferences about telemedicine. <b>Methods:</b> Using data from a patient experience survey collected in Spring 2020, we compared LTR responses to open comments. Through content analysis, we transformed comments into categorical variables and used those variables in a multiple logistic regression model to predict LTR responses. We also thematically analyzed comments to further elucidate our results. <b>Results:</b> Only about half the comments mentioned telemedicine at all. Around 6% of comments were wholly incongruent with LTR responses. In many comments, ideas about telemedicine were semantically entangled with ideas about providers. Our logistic regression found strong associations between sentiments expressed in comments and LTR responses. However, comments about telemedicine were relatively poor predictors for LTR compared to comments about the provider. <b>Discussion:</b> NPS, which is included on many patient experience surveys used by health systems across the United States, has limitations for use as a measure of the acceptability of telemedicine for patients. Patients have more than telemedicine in mind when responding to the LTR question, and ratings conflate attitudes about providers, office policies, and staff with the telemedicine modality. More direct measures are necessary for meaningful research on the acceptability and usability of telemedicine for patients.

Telemedicine Journal and e-HealthVol. 31(5)
Tufts University (US), MaineHealth (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Net Promoter Score as a Reflection of Patients’ Opinions About Telemedical Visits: A Mixed Methods Analysis — Mike Kohut, Rachel Alfiero, et al. · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS