A multidimensional assessment of Antarctic terrestrial biological data

Abstract Aim The globally significant communities of terrestrial Antarctica face an uncertain future amid growing threats in the region. Emerging data‐driven approaches must be leveraged to predict and understand patterns of biodiversity across the continent. A new comprehensive database of Antarctic biological occurrence records, the Biodiversity of Ice‐free Antarctica Database, will enable such novel fundamental and applied biodiversity modelling. However, there are limitations of assembled occurrence databases that, if unaccounted for, can result in poor model inference and outcomes. We perform a data quality assessment of the new database to highlight its potential and to identify data limitations that must be considered during modelling. Location Antarctica. Methods We assessed the coverage of the Biodiversity of Ice‐free Antarctica Database across geographic, environmental, taxonomic, and temporal dimensions at several spatial scales. Results We demonstrate great potential for the database to improve our understanding of many at risk and poorly known Antarctic functional groups. We also provide evidence for limitations of the database across data dimensions, including low geographic coverage that is biased towards research stations, poor coverage of environmental variation across the landscape, and long periods since records were last collected. The magnitude of these limitations varies substantially by region and spatial scale. Main Conclusions In combination, data limitations have a range of implications for terrestrial Antarctic modelling, including heightening the risk of model extrapolation. For future use, we recommend prioritising, mitigating, and presenting context‐specific model uncertainty, advancing strategic data collection, and exploiting shared modelling challenges elsewhere in the world to maximise the opportunities for this unique dataset to robustly advance science and conservation in Antarctica.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity and Distributions
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13909
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Polar Research and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multidimensional assessment of Antarctic terrestrial biological data

Kate J. Helmstedt, Aleks Terauds, Charlotte R. Patterson, Justine D. S. Shaw
3 citations
Diversity and Distributions
Polar Research and Ecology
1.38
article

A multidimensional assessment of Antarctic terrestrial biological data

Kate J. Helmstedt, Aleks Terauds, Charlotte R. Patterson, Justine D. S. Shaw
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim The globally significant communities of terrestrial Antarctica face an uncertain future amid growing threats in the region. Emerging data‐driven approaches must be leveraged to predict and understand patterns of biodiversity across the continent. A new comprehensive database of Antarctic biological occurrence records, the Biodiversity of Ice‐free Antarctica Database, will enable such novel fundamental and applied biodiversity modelling. However, there are limitations of assembled occurrence databases that, if unaccounted for, can result in poor model inference and outcomes. We perform a data quality assessment of the new database to highlight its potential and to identify data limitations that must be considered during modelling. Location Antarctica. Methods We assessed the coverage of the Biodiversity of Ice‐free Antarctica Database across geographic, environmental, taxonomic, and temporal dimensions at several spatial scales. Results We demonstrate great potential for the database to improve our understanding of many at risk and poorly known Antarctic functional groups. We also provide evidence for limitations of the database across data dimensions, including low geographic coverage that is biased towards research stations, poor coverage of environmental variation across the landscape, and long periods since records were last collected. The magnitude of these limitations varies substantially by region and spatial scale. Main Conclusions In combination, data limitations have a range of implications for terrestrial Antarctic modelling, including heightening the risk of model extrapolation. For future use, we recommend prioritising, mitigating, and presenting context‐specific model uncertainty, advancing strategic data collection, and exploiting shared modelling challenges elsewhere in the world to maximise the opportunities for this unique dataset to robustly advance science and conservation in Antarctica.

Diversity and DistributionsVol. 31(1)
Australian Antarctic Division (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Australian Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Polar Research and Ecology
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.