Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial

Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386). The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined. In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively). Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified. • Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a novel frontier in resectable oral cancer . • Neoadjuvant regimen ( ± IRX-2) showed tumor responses and immune modulation. • No survival differences were noted for the cytokine vs. non-cytokine regimen. • Immune effects suggest the IRX-2 regimen is feasible for combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Oncology Reports
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100706
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial

Ariane Nguyen, Jim McCaul, Mihir R. Patel, Celine Mauquoi et al.
1 citations
Oral Oncology Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.28
article

Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial

Ariane Nguyen, Jim McCaul, Mihir R. Patel, Celine Mauquoi, Ana Paula Victorina, Maureen A. Sartor, Cláudio Roberto Cernea, Felipe José Silva Melo Cruz, Nabil F. Saba, R. Bryan Bell, Jonathan B. McHugh, Dennis H. Kraus, Michael J. Kaplan, Frabicio Oliveira, Gustavo Girotto, Wanessa A. Martins, Greg A. Krempl, Jorge J. Nieva, Jason G. Newman, Kevin Higgins, Gregory T. Wolf, Jeff Moyer, Aru Panwar, Laura S. Rozek, Siyu Liu, Emily Bellile, Clodoaldo Zago Campos, Joseph Valentino, Audrey Erman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386). The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined. In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively). Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified. • Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a novel frontier in resectable oral cancer . • Neoadjuvant regimen ( ± IRX-2) showed tumor responses and immune modulation. • No survival differences were noted for the cytokine vs. non-cytokine regimen. • Immune effects suggest the IRX-2 regimen is feasible for combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Oral Oncology ReportsVol. 13
University of Southern California (US), Gaertner (United States) (US), Emory University (US), University of Michigan (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Providence Portland Medical Center (US), International Drug Development Institute (Belgium) (BE), Instituto de Gastroenterologia de Goiânia (BR), Hospital Erasto Gaertner (BR), Michigan Medicine (US), Banner - University Medical Center Tucson (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA (BR), Hospital de Base (BR), Winship Cancer Institute, Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.