The sayings that Ibn Arafa weakened in his interpretation because they contradicted Qur’anic readings and the rules of the Arabic language (Collect and study)

This research aims to find out the sayings that Imam Ibn Arafa rejected and judged to be weak because they contradicted the Qur’anic readings and the rules of the Arabic language in his interpretation, which is labeled (Ibn Arafa’s interpretation), while studying these sayings and comparing them with the sayings of the commentators and linguists. The descriptive approach was used in its deductive approach. This research came in an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion. The introduction addressed the importance of the research, its objectives, the reason for choosing it, its limits, relevant previous studies, the research methodology, and its plan. The first section: was to introduce Imam Ibn Arafa, and the second section: included statements that Ibn Arafa had weakened. Arafa for contradicting the Qur’anic readings, while the third section was devoted to the sayings that Ibn Arafa weakened it because it violated the rules of the Arabic language, and the research concluded with a conclusion that included the results and recommendations. The research reached a number of results, the most important of which is: Ibn Arafa’s interpretation is a dictation that he delivers during his scholarly exegetical sessions. He did not write and write extensively. His approach was to respond to readings. The Qur’an and linguistic rules, analysis and good reasoning. As for the most important recommendations: conducting a study to clarify the impact of his readings and balancing them with the opinions of the imams of this science. Keywords: Al-Wargami, sayings, readings, interpretation, weakness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ARID International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36772/arid.aijssh.2025.6135
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The sayings that Ibn Arafa weakened in his interpretation because they contradicted Qur’anic readings and the rules of the Arabic language (Collect and study)

Mohd Miskeen Ali
ARID International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

The sayings that Ibn Arafa weakened in his interpretation because they contradicted Qur’anic readings and the rules of the Arabic language (Collect and study)

Mohd Miskeen Ali
article en

Abstract

This research aims to find out the sayings that Imam Ibn Arafa rejected and judged to be weak because they contradicted the Qur’anic readings and the rules of the Arabic language in his interpretation, which is labeled (Ibn Arafa’s interpretation), while studying these sayings and comparing them with the sayings of the commentators and linguists. The descriptive approach was used in its deductive approach. This research came in an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion. The introduction addressed the importance of the research, its objectives, the reason for choosing it, its limits, relevant previous studies, the research methodology, and its plan. The first section: was to introduce Imam Ibn Arafa, and the second section: included statements that Ibn Arafa had weakened. Arafa for contradicting the Qur’anic readings, while the third section was devoted to the sayings that Ibn Arafa weakened it because it violated the rules of the Arabic language, and the research concluded with a conclusion that included the results and recommendations. The research reached a number of results, the most important of which is: Ibn Arafa’s interpretation is a dictation that he delivers during his scholarly exegetical sessions. He did not write and write extensively. His approach was to respond to readings. The Qur’an and linguistic rules, analysis and good reasoning. As for the most important recommendations: conducting a study to clarify the impact of his readings and balancing them with the opinions of the imams of this science. Keywords: Al-Wargami, sayings, readings, interpretation, weakness.

ARID International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.