Don't take me for a free‐ride: Chinese Agricultural Geographical Indications and firms' export quality

Abstract Geographical Indication (GI) is a rising policy in developing countries, which has been relatively neglected in the existing literature. This article studies Chinese agricultural GIs and its impact on firms’ exports. By relating newly authorized GIs with firm‐product‐location‐destination level customs trade data according to GIs’ geographical coverage and product type, we estimate the impact of these new GIs on firm's exports. Importantly, we can distinguish GIs with and without quality supervision. For the latter we find negative impacts on export quality, which is not the case for GIs with quality supervision. We interpret this in the context of our theoretical framework as evidence for quality free‐riding, where individual firms have an incentive to lower the quality of the export product. We show that this negative effect is less, the more concentrated an industry is or the more GIs there are for a particular product. Furthermore, our results suggest that the China‐EU agreement on Geographical Indications may play the role of quality supervision and prevent the possibility of free‐riding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12871
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don't take me for a free‐ride: Chinese Agricultural Geographical Indications and firms' export quality

Haiou Mao, Holger Görg
8 citations
Agricultural Economics
Global trade and economics
6.63
article

Don't take me for a free‐ride: Chinese Agricultural Geographical Indications and firms' export quality

Haiou Mao, Holger Görg
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Geographical Indication (GI) is a rising policy in developing countries, which has been relatively neglected in the existing literature. This article studies Chinese agricultural GIs and its impact on firms’ exports. By relating newly authorized GIs with firm‐product‐location‐destination level customs trade data according to GIs’ geographical coverage and product type, we estimate the impact of these new GIs on firm's exports. Importantly, we can distinguish GIs with and without quality supervision. For the latter we find negative impacts on export quality, which is not the case for GIs with quality supervision. We interpret this in the context of our theoretical framework as evidence for quality free‐riding, where individual firms have an incentive to lower the quality of the export product. We show that this negative effect is less, the more concentrated an industry is or the more GIs there are for a particular product. Furthermore, our results suggest that the China‐EU agreement on Geographical Indications may play the role of quality supervision and prevent the possibility of free‐riding.

Agricultural EconomicsVol. 56(2)
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global trade and economics
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Don't take me for a free‐ride: Chinese Agricultural Geographical Indications and firms' export quality — Haiou Mao, Holger Görg · Agricultural Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS