Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Steel Frames with External BRBs: Pseudo‐Dynamic Hybrid Testing and Numerical Parametric Analysis

ABSTRACT The use of buckling‐restrained braces (BRBs) is an effective strategy for improving the seismic performance of existing structures. BRBs can be included within existing frames, creating an additional load path and contributing to their strength, stiffness, ductility, and, in turn, energy dissipation capacity. However, BRBs are typically inserted within the structural mesh of the existing frames, thus requiring the demolition and reconstruction of non‐structural components. The present study explores the seismic retrofitting of existing steel structures, considering an external placement of BRBs to minimize the invasiveness of the intervention scheme and, consequently, business interruptions and indirect losses. A two‐story steel moment‐resisting frame (MRF) designed primarily for gravity loads and retrofitted with BRBs placed externally to the frames were considered for case study purposes. The research includes large‐scale Pseudo‐Dynamic Hybrid tests performed as part of the HITFRAMES (i.e., HybrId Testing of an Existing Steel Frame with Infills under Multiple EarthquakeS) project funded by the EU‐H2020 SERA Consortium in Europe. The experimental results provided significant insights into the seismic response of the retrofitted structure and allowed the calibration of advanced 3D finite element models. An extensive numerical parametric analysis was performed to investigate some of the key variables affecting the local and global response of the structure. The results provide valuable insights into effectively implementing this retrofit solution and the influence of BRB eccentricity on the seismic response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4292
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Steel Frames with External BRBs: Pseudo‐Dynamic Hybrid Testing and Numerical Parametric Analysis

Fabio Freddi, Νικόλαος Σταθάς, Mario D’Aniello, Jing‐Ren Wu et al.
6 citations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
1.57
article

Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Steel Frames with External BRBs: Pseudo‐Dynamic Hybrid Testing and Numerical Parametric Analysis

Fabio Freddi, Νικόλαος Σταθάς, Mario D’Aniello, Jing‐Ren Wu, Fernando Gutiérrez‐Urzúa, Stathis Bousias, Oh‐Sung Kwon, Jamin Park, Elias Strepelias, Massimo Cicia, Luigi Di Sarno
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of buckling‐restrained braces (BRBs) is an effective strategy for improving the seismic performance of existing structures. BRBs can be included within existing frames, creating an additional load path and contributing to their strength, stiffness, ductility, and, in turn, energy dissipation capacity. However, BRBs are typically inserted within the structural mesh of the existing frames, thus requiring the demolition and reconstruction of non‐structural components. The present study explores the seismic retrofitting of existing steel structures, considering an external placement of BRBs to minimize the invasiveness of the intervention scheme and, consequently, business interruptions and indirect losses. A two‐story steel moment‐resisting frame (MRF) designed primarily for gravity loads and retrofitted with BRBs placed externally to the frames were considered for case study purposes. The research includes large‐scale Pseudo‐Dynamic Hybrid tests performed as part of the HITFRAMES (i.e., HybrId Testing of an Existing Steel Frame with Infills under Multiple EarthquakeS) project funded by the EU‐H2020 SERA Consortium in Europe. The experimental results provided significant insights into the seismic response of the retrofitted structure and allowed the calibration of advanced 3D finite element models. An extensive numerical parametric analysis was performed to investigate some of the key variables affecting the local and global response of the structure. The results provide valuable insights into effectively implementing this retrofit solution and the influence of BRB eccentricity on the seismic response.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 54(3)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Patras (GR), University of Toronto (CA), University College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Myongji University (KR)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.