John of Damascus Rewriting Cyril of Alexandria: The Neglected Source of Contra Nestorianos (CPG 8053)

This article revisits the relationship between John of Damascus’ two anti-Nestorian treatises, refuting the dominant view that Contra Nestorianos is a reworking of De fide contra Nestorianos. Instead, it demonstrates that Contra Nestorianos is a composition modelled closely on a hitherto overlooked source: Cyril of Alexandria’s Quod unus sit Christus. By engaging in a process of selective rewriting, John adopts Cyril’s arguments and method of refuting Nestorianism through biblical exegesis, while also making his own distinctive contributions in terms of structure, theological content and style. This study not only sheds light on the influence of Cyril’s work on John but also on the unique position of Contra Nestorianos within the broader context of John’s corpus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Estudios Bizantinos
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37536/ebizantinos.2024.12.2739
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

John of Damascus Rewriting Cyril of Alexandria: The Neglected Source of Contra Nestorianos (CPG 8053)

Petros Tsagkaropoulos
Revista de Estudios Bizantinos
Byzantine Studies and History
article

John of Damascus Rewriting Cyril of Alexandria: The Neglected Source of Contra Nestorianos (CPG 8053)

Petros Tsagkaropoulos
article en

Abstract

This article revisits the relationship between John of Damascus’ two anti-Nestorian treatises, refuting the dominant view that Contra Nestorianos is a reworking of De fide contra Nestorianos. Instead, it demonstrates that Contra Nestorianos is a composition modelled closely on a hitherto overlooked source: Cyril of Alexandria’s Quod unus sit Christus. By engaging in a process of selective rewriting, John adopts Cyril’s arguments and method of refuting Nestorianism through biblical exegesis, while also making his own distinctive contributions in terms of structure, theological content and style. This study not only sheds light on the influence of Cyril’s work on John but also on the unique position of Contra Nestorianos within the broader context of John’s corpus.

Revista de Estudios BizantinosVol. 12
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

John of Damascus Rewriting Cyril of Alexandria: The Neglected Source of Contra Nestorianos (CPG 8053) — Petros Tsagkaropoulos · Revista de Estudios Bizantinos (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS