A global analysis of adaptation to societal aging across low-, middle- and high-income countries using the Global Aging Society Index

We have previously presented a multidimensional Aging Society Index, a weighted summation of five domains central to successful adaptation to societal aging: well-being, productivity and engagement, equity, cohesion and security, as a tool to assess countries' adaptation to demographic transformation. As the index was based on data from developed countries and some of the individual metrics or weightings may not be well suited for application to low- and middle-income countries, we here present the scores on a modified index (Global Aging Society Index) on 143 countries distributed across the span of economic development. Only 5 out of 143 (3.5%) countries had higher scores for women than men. Countries with the most notable gender differences were primarily low-income countries. The multidimensional index permits cross-national comparisons and may facilitate the identification of targets for developing policies and programs to enhance the likelihood that older persons will age successfully.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Aging
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-024-00772-3
Citations
28
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global analysis of adaptation to societal aging across low-, middle- and high-income countries using the Global Aging Society Index

Frank F. Furstenberg, Cynthia Chen, John W. Rowe, Julian Lim et al.
28 citations
Nature Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
14.78
article

A global analysis of adaptation to societal aging across low-, middle- and high-income countries using the Global Aging Society Index

Frank F. Furstenberg, Cynthia Chen, John W. Rowe, Julian Lim, Jay Olshansky, Laura L. Carstensen, John Beard, Julie Zissimopoulos, John Rother, Jemima Koh, Toni C. Antonucci, Dana P. Goldman, Axel Börsch‐Supan, Linda P. Fried, David H. Rehkopf, James Jackson, Martin Kohli, Lisa Berkman
article en
28 citations

Abstract

We have previously presented a multidimensional Aging Society Index, a weighted summation of five domains central to successful adaptation to societal aging: well-being, productivity and engagement, equity, cohesion and security, as a tool to assess countries' adaptation to demographic transformation. As the index was based on data from developed countries and some of the individual metrics or weightings may not be well suited for application to low- and middle-income countries, we here present the scores on a modified index (Global Aging Society Index) on 143 countries distributed across the span of economic development. Only 5 out of 143 (3.5%) countries had higher scores for women than men. Countries with the most notable gender differences were primarily low-income countries. The multidimensional index permits cross-national comparisons and may facilitate the identification of targets for developing policies and programs to enhance the likelihood that older persons will age successfully.

Nature AgingVol. 5(1)
University of Southern California (US), University of London (GB), Illinois Department of Public Health (US), Harvard University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), National University of Singapore (SG), University of Michigan (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy (DE), National University Health System (SG), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), European University Institute (IT), Stanford University (US)
National University of Singapore, Ministry of Education - Singapore, Ministry of Education, India, Medical Research Council, National Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Health disparities and outcomes
14.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.