Non‐visible aspects of ceramics: Archaeological science approaches in Andean pottery studies

Abstract This article examines the history of the application of archaeological science in studies of pre‐Hispanic pottery from the Andes, South America, through academic publications from the 1960s to the present. It details the questions addressed by, analytical tools used for and theoretical underpinnings of investigations into provenance and technology. Two case studies from this literature review illustrate how taking an archaeological science approach to provenance and technology contributes to our understanding of broader socio‐cultural issues. The results underscore the importance of adopting a multidisciplinary approach and highlight significant regional differences in research focus and methodology. The results also emphasize the need for transdisciplinary work and a critical assessment of archaeometric techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeometry
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.13053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐visible aspects of ceramics: Archaeological science approaches in Andean pottery studies

Andrea Martínez‐Carrasco, Javiera Gajardo‐Araos
1 citations
Archaeometry
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
1.59
article

Non‐visible aspects of ceramics: Archaeological science approaches in Andean pottery studies

Andrea Martínez‐Carrasco, Javiera Gajardo‐Araos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the history of the application of archaeological science in studies of pre‐Hispanic pottery from the Andes, South America, through academic publications from the 1960s to the present. It details the questions addressed by, analytical tools used for and theoretical underpinnings of investigations into provenance and technology. Two case studies from this literature review illustrate how taking an archaeological science approach to provenance and technology contributes to our understanding of broader socio‐cultural issues. The results underscore the importance of adopting a multidisciplinary approach and highlight significant regional differences in research focus and methodology. The results also emphasize the need for transdisciplinary work and a critical assessment of archaeometric techniques.

ArchaeometryVol. 67(S2)
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.