Perception of occupational health and safety in the manufacturing sector: a qualitative evaluation

<i>Objectives</i>. Earlier work found gaps with respect to legislative compliance and disparities in perceptions, attitudes and beliefs towards occupational health and safety in the Ontario manufacturing sector. The current follow-up study was undertaken to gain a more thorough understanding of the cause of these gaps and differences in perspectives. <i>Methods</i>. Focus group discussions were held with workers and managers separately. Key questions related to health and safety in general, health and safety training, and health and safety communication were asked of each focus group. The discussions were qualitatively analysed. <i>Results</i>. Overall, 12 worker focus groups (<i>n</i> = 76) and seven manager focus groups (<i>n</i> = 38) were conducted. Individuals who felt safe in their workplace indicated that it was a supportive environment, and that health and safety was a priority. Health and safety training was considered important but improvements in engagement and frequency were suggested. <i>Conclusions.</i> Health and safety communication might be hindered by technical terms and language barriers. Delivering this communication in multiple ways as well as the tone of communication should be taken into consideration. Overall, safety culture was lacking and manufacturing workplaces should be mindful of the gaps identified to improve health and safety performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2435707
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of occupational health and safety in the manufacturing sector: a qualitative evaluation

Chun‐Yip Hon, Craig Fairclough, Jaskaren Randhawa
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Perception of occupational health and safety in the manufacturing sector: a qualitative evaluation

Chun‐Yip Hon, Craig Fairclough, Jaskaren Randhawa
article en

Abstract

<i>Objectives</i>. Earlier work found gaps with respect to legislative compliance and disparities in perceptions, attitudes and beliefs towards occupational health and safety in the Ontario manufacturing sector. The current follow-up study was undertaken to gain a more thorough understanding of the cause of these gaps and differences in perspectives. <i>Methods</i>. Focus group discussions were held with workers and managers separately. Key questions related to health and safety in general, health and safety training, and health and safety communication were asked of each focus group. The discussions were qualitatively analysed. <i>Results</i>. Overall, 12 worker focus groups (<i>n</i> = 76) and seven manager focus groups (<i>n</i> = 38) were conducted. Individuals who felt safe in their workplace indicated that it was a supportive environment, and that health and safety was a priority. Health and safety training was considered important but improvements in engagement and frequency were suggested. <i>Conclusions.</i> Health and safety communication might be hindered by technical terms and language barriers. Delivering this communication in multiple ways as well as the tone of communication should be taken into consideration. Overall, safety culture was lacking and manufacturing workplaces should be mindful of the gaps identified to improve health and safety performance.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and ErgonomicsVol. 31(1)
Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Mitacs
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.