Measuring the Impact of Services for Human Trafficking Survivors: Tracking Clinically Significant Improvement Across Outcomes

Evaluations of anti-trafficking services typically use statistical significance to determine effectiveness. However, statistically significant increases in quantitative assessments do not necessarily indicate substantive changes in survivors’ lives. This study employs clinically significant improvement as a standard for measuring outcomes among survivors who received services at the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking (Cast, N = 167). Analyses focus on Emotional, Medical, Housing, and Social Support needs as measured through a multidimensional assessment administered every three to six months. We operationalize “measurable improvement” as an increase of 0.5 points (12.5 percent of the scale) and “substantial improvement” as an increase of 1.0 point (25 percent of the scale). We use time-to-event analysis to model improvement over time. Median time to measurable improvement ranged from seven to 10 months across dimensions and median to substantial improvement ranged from 12 to 20 months. Labor trafficking survivors had significantly longer timelines to improvement for Medical and Social Support needs than survivors who had experienced both labor and sex trafficking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Science
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244241305048
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Impact of Services for Human Trafficking Survivors: Tracking Clinically Significant Improvement Across Outcomes

Ethan Czuy Levine, David Smith
Journal of Applied Social Science
Sex work and related issues
article

Measuring the Impact of Services for Human Trafficking Survivors: Tracking Clinically Significant Improvement Across Outcomes

Ethan Czuy Levine, David Smith
article en

Abstract

Evaluations of anti-trafficking services typically use statistical significance to determine effectiveness. However, statistically significant increases in quantitative assessments do not necessarily indicate substantive changes in survivors’ lives. This study employs clinically significant improvement as a standard for measuring outcomes among survivors who received services at the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking (Cast, N = 167). Analyses focus on Emotional, Medical, Housing, and Social Support needs as measured through a multidimensional assessment administered every three to six months. We operationalize “measurable improvement” as an increase of 0.5 points (12.5 percent of the scale) and “substantial improvement” as an increase of 1.0 point (25 percent of the scale). We use time-to-event analysis to model improvement over time. Median time to measurable improvement ranged from seven to 10 months across dimensions and median to substantial improvement ranged from 12 to 20 months. Labor trafficking survivors had significantly longer timelines to improvement for Medical and Social Support needs than survivors who had experienced both labor and sex trafficking.

Journal of Applied Social ScienceVol. 19(1)
Sisters of Mercy Health System (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.