No Evidence for a Significant Evolution of M<sub>•</sub>–M. Relation in Massive Galaxies up to z ∼ 4

Abstract Over the past two decades, tight correlations between black hole masses ( M • ) and their host galaxy properties have been firmly established for massive galaxies (with stellar mass <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:math> ) at low- z ( z &lt; 1), indicating coevolution of supermassive black holes and galaxies. However, the situation at high- z , especially beyond cosmic noon ( z ≳ 2.5), is controversial. With a combination of JWST Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam)/wide field slitless spectroscopy (WFSS) from FRESCO, CONGRESS and deep multiband NIRCam/image data from JADES in the GOODS fields, we study the black-hole-to-galaxy mass relation at z ∼ 1–4. After identifying 18 broad-line active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at 1 &lt; z &lt; 4 (with 8 at z &gt; 2.5) from the WFSS data, we measure their black hole masses based on broad near-infrared lines (Pa α , Pa β , and He i λ 10833 Å), and constrain their stellar masses from AGN-galaxy image decomposition or spectral energy distribution decomposition. Taking account of the observational biases, the intrinsic scatter of the M • − M * relation, and the errors in mass measurements, we find no significant difference in the M • / M * ratio for 2.5 &lt; z &lt; 4 compared to that at lower redshifts (1 &lt; z &lt; 2.5), suggesting no evolution of the M • − M * relation at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:math> up to z ∼ 4.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad973b
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Evidence for a Significant Evolution of M•–M. Relation in Massive Galaxies up to z ∼ 4

Eiichi Egami, Francesco D’Eugenio, Zhiyuan Ji, George H. Rieke et al.
19 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
6.30
article

No Evidence for a Significant Evolution of M•–M. Relation in Massive Galaxies up to z ∼ 4

Eiichi Egami, Francesco D’Eugenio, Zhiyuan Ji, George H. Rieke, Jakob M. Helton, Fengwu Sun, Chiara Circosta, Kevin Hainline, Sandro Tacchella, Chris J. Willott, Jianwei Lyu, Christina C. Williams, Yongda Zhu, Meredith A. Stone, Pierluigi Rinaldi, Irene Shivaei, Yang Sun, Jan Scholtz, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Andrew J. Bunker, Phillip A. Cargile, Brant E. Robertson
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Abstract Over the past two decades, tight correlations between black hole masses ( M • ) and their host galaxy properties have been firmly established for massive galaxies (with stellar mass <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:math> ) at low- z ( z &lt; 1), indicating coevolution of supermassive black holes and galaxies. However, the situation at high- z , especially beyond cosmic noon ( z ≳ 2.5), is controversial. With a combination of JWST Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam)/wide field slitless spectroscopy (WFSS) from FRESCO, CONGRESS and deep multiband NIRCam/image data from JADES in the GOODS fields, we study the black-hole-to-galaxy mass relation at z ∼ 1–4. After identifying 18 broad-line active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at 1 &lt; z &lt; 4 (with 8 at z &gt; 2.5) from the WFSS data, we measure their black hole masses based on broad near-infrared lines (Pa α , Pa β , and He i λ 10833 Å), and constrain their stellar masses from AGN-galaxy image decomposition or spectral energy distribution decomposition. Taking account of the observational biases, the intrinsic scatter of the M • − M * relation, and the errors in mass measurements, we find no significant difference in the M • / M * ratio for 2.5 &lt; z &lt; 4 compared to that at lower redshifts (1 &lt; z &lt; 2.5), suggesting no evolution of the M • − M * relation at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:math> up to z ∼ 4.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 978(1)
Goddard Space Flight Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
6.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.