Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Increased Usage and Improvements in Clinical Outcomes in Canada

In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a minority of patients have access to a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor (MRD). To fill this gap, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) are an increasingly selected donor source. Usage and outcomes after MUD HCT for Canada are not described. We investigated temporal trends in MUD compared to MRD HCT from 2000 to 2019 using data reported to the Cell Therapy and Transplant Canada (CTTC) Registry. Of 7571 first allogeneic HCTs between 2000 and 2019, the proportion of MUD HCTs rose from 35.1% to 56.3% in the early (2000-2009) and later (2010-2019) eras, respectively. Comparing the two donor sources, the 5-year overall survival (OS) after MUD HCT for patients with malignant diseases was inferior to MRD HCT in the early era (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, in the later era, OS was comparable for the two donor sources (<i>p</i> = 0.969). For patients with non-malignant diseases, the 5-year OS after MUD HCT was inferior to MRD in the early era (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but in the later era, the 5-year OS was similar between the two donor sources (<i>p</i> = 0.209). Improvements in OS after MUD HCT were accompanied by corresponding reductions in the 2-year non-relapse mortality after MUD HCT. We conclude that MUDs are the most common donor source in Canada, and key clinical outcomes after MUD have improved over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010010
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Increased Usage and Improvements in Clinical Outcomes in Canada

Matthew D. Seftel, Oliver Bucher, Grace Musto, Tony H. Truong et al.
Current Oncology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Increased Usage and Improvements in Clinical Outcomes in Canada

Matthew D. Seftel, Oliver Bucher, Grace Musto, Tony H. Truong, Kristjan Paulson, Ivan Pašić, Kevin A. Hay, David Allan
article en

Abstract

In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a minority of patients have access to a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor (MRD). To fill this gap, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) are an increasingly selected donor source. Usage and outcomes after MUD HCT for Canada are not described. We investigated temporal trends in MUD compared to MRD HCT from 2000 to 2019 using data reported to the Cell Therapy and Transplant Canada (CTTC) Registry. Of 7571 first allogeneic HCTs between 2000 and 2019, the proportion of MUD HCTs rose from 35.1% to 56.3% in the early (2000-2009) and later (2010-2019) eras, respectively. Comparing the two donor sources, the 5-year overall survival (OS) after MUD HCT for patients with malignant diseases was inferior to MRD HCT in the early era (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, in the later era, OS was comparable for the two donor sources (<i>p</i> = 0.969). For patients with non-malignant diseases, the 5-year OS after MUD HCT was inferior to MRD in the early era (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but in the later era, the 5-year OS was similar between the two donor sources (<i>p</i> = 0.209). Improvements in OS after MUD HCT were accompanied by corresponding reductions in the 2-year non-relapse mortality after MUD HCT. We conclude that MUDs are the most common donor source in Canada, and key clinical outcomes after MUD have improved over time.

Current OncologyVol. 32(1)
University Health Network (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), CancerCare Manitoba (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), Canadian Blood Services (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.