Clinical comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study
Both LRH and RRH demonstrated good short-term efficacy, with RRH outperforming LRH in terms of reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stays and operation times, and fewer composite complications. However, the RRH group faces a higher risk of early cancer recurrence and incurs greater expenses. In summary, comprehensive long-term prospective studies are needed to thoroughly explore the effectiveness and safety of both LRH and RRH.
Authors
- Ming‐Hong Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-9356)
- Lihong Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-8214)
- Lijuan Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-7614)
- Tao Yi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-6063)
- Yan Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2852-8498)
Institutions
- The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
- Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Surgery
- Published
- 2024-12-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02716-5
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.58