Clinical comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Both LRH and RRH demonstrated good short-term efficacy, with RRH outperforming LRH in terms of reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stays and operation times, and fewer composite complications. However, the RRH group faces a higher risk of early cancer recurrence and incurs greater expenses. In summary, comprehensive long-term prospective studies are needed to thoroughly explore the effectiveness and safety of both LRH and RRH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02716-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Ming‐Hong Sun, Lihong Yang, Lijuan Zhang, Tao Yi et al.
1 citations
BMC Surgery
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
0.58
article

Clinical comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Ming‐Hong Sun, Lihong Yang, Lijuan Zhang, Tao Yi, Yan Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Both LRH and RRH demonstrated good short-term efficacy, with RRH outperforming LRH in terms of reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stays and operation times, and fewer composite complications. However, the RRH group faces a higher risk of early cancer recurrence and incurs greater expenses. In summary, comprehensive long-term prospective studies are needed to thoroughly explore the effectiveness and safety of both LRH and RRH.

BMC SurgeryVol. 24(1)
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study — Ming‐Hong Sun, Lihong Yang, et al. · BMC Surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS