Driving simulator for road safety design: a comparison between virtual reality tests and on-field tests

Virtual reality simulations conducted by driving simulators represent a methodology to assess both the quality of road design and road safety in a safe, controlled, and replicable environment. Nowadays, there are numerous studies that use driving simulators to analyze the driver's response when specific road safety treatments are planned before these are implemented. This approach allows the road designer/scientist to estimate the potential safety effectiveness of the countermeasure/design configuration considered. However, although virtual reality simulations are potentially extremely useful in the evaluation of road configuration design and treatments effectiveness, they also have cons. The two most important are the limitations in the reproducibility of the real world environment and the difference in drivers’ behavior due to the awareness that they are conducting a test. In this context, our research aims to overcome these limitations through a robust validation procedure designed to demonstrate that the results obtained in virtual reality are reliable and can be exploited to design safer roads. According to the state of the art, the statistical procedure adopted allows the comparison between data collected during virtual reality experiments with those collected in on-field experiment using an instrumented vehicle. The on-field test was conducted a few years after the implementation of the safety measures evaluated by means of a driving simulator experiment. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the results of the two experiments to determine if the differences between them are more likely to arise from random chance or not, to demonstrate the reliability of the virtual simulations and to identify the main limitations in exploiting the results. The procedure was repeated on the road section affected by the reconfiguration intervention analyzed in virtual reality, using the same validation procedure usually adopted to validate a driving simulator before the implementation of a safety measure. The procedure demonstrates the relative validity of the virtual reality experiment and, in some road segments, also the absolute validity of the results obtained. It confirms the ability of the driving simulator to be used in the preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the designed safety solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Technology in Construction
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.044
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving simulator for road safety design: a comparison between virtual reality tests and on-field tests

Monica Meocci, Francesca La Torre, Alessandro Terrosi, Andrea Paliotto et al.
3 citations
Journal of Information Technology in Construction
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.93
article

Driving simulator for road safety design: a comparison between virtual reality tests and on-field tests

Monica Meocci, Francesca La Torre, Alessandro Terrosi, Andrea Paliotto, Irene Infante
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Virtual reality simulations conducted by driving simulators represent a methodology to assess both the quality of road design and road safety in a safe, controlled, and replicable environment. Nowadays, there are numerous studies that use driving simulators to analyze the driver's response when specific road safety treatments are planned before these are implemented. This approach allows the road designer/scientist to estimate the potential safety effectiveness of the countermeasure/design configuration considered. However, although virtual reality simulations are potentially extremely useful in the evaluation of road configuration design and treatments effectiveness, they also have cons. The two most important are the limitations in the reproducibility of the real world environment and the difference in drivers’ behavior due to the awareness that they are conducting a test. In this context, our research aims to overcome these limitations through a robust validation procedure designed to demonstrate that the results obtained in virtual reality are reliable and can be exploited to design safer roads. According to the state of the art, the statistical procedure adopted allows the comparison between data collected during virtual reality experiments with those collected in on-field experiment using an instrumented vehicle. The on-field test was conducted a few years after the implementation of the safety measures evaluated by means of a driving simulator experiment. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the results of the two experiments to determine if the differences between them are more likely to arise from random chance or not, to demonstrate the reliability of the virtual simulations and to identify the main limitations in exploiting the results. The procedure was repeated on the road section affected by the reconfiguration intervention analyzed in virtual reality, using the same validation procedure usually adopted to validate a driving simulator before the implementation of a safety measure. The procedure demonstrates the relative validity of the virtual reality experiment and, in some road segments, also the absolute validity of the results obtained. It confirms the ability of the driving simulator to be used in the preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the designed safety solutions.

Journal of Information Technology in ConstructionVol. 29
University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.