Children’s and adolescents’ reasoning about distributive fairness and educational inequalities

To investigate children's and adolescents' reasoning about distributive fairness in a rural area of Nepal, we asked participants (53% girls, <i>N</i> = 706, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 13.48; <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 1.79) to distribute educational resources to schools that varied by social class (SC) and to justify their allocation. Most participants allocated equally or equitably; only a minority rewarded the higher-SC school with extra resources. Novel results revealed multiple forms of reasoning coexisting in children's and adolescents' explanations about distributive fairness; participants' reasoning did not just mirror their numeric allocation. Those who allocated equally were primarily concerned with nondiscrimination, whereby some participants focused on social equality and emphasized removing structural barriers. Furthermore, participants' allocation and reasoning depended on their SC and positive experiences at school.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254241308503
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children’s and adolescents’ reasoning about distributive fairness and educational inequalities

Jeanine Grütter, Melanie Killen, Riley N. Sims, Carmen Barth et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Early Childhood Education and Development
2.10
article

Children’s and adolescents’ reasoning about distributive fairness and educational inequalities

Jeanine Grütter, Melanie Killen, Riley N. Sims, Carmen Barth, Iren Karki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To investigate children's and adolescents' reasoning about distributive fairness in a rural area of Nepal, we asked participants (53% girls, <i>N</i> = 706, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 13.48; <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 1.79) to distribute educational resources to schools that varied by social class (SC) and to justify their allocation. Most participants allocated equally or equitably; only a minority rewarded the higher-SC school with extra resources. Novel results revealed multiple forms of reasoning coexisting in children's and adolescents' explanations about distributive fairness; participants' reasoning did not just mirror their numeric allocation. Those who allocated equally were primarily concerned with nondiscrimination, whereby some participants focused on social equality and emphasized removing structural barriers. Furthermore, participants' allocation and reasoning depended on their SC and positive experiences at school.

International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentVol. 50(2)
University of Konstanz (DE), Adler (CA), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Early Childhood Education and Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.