Resisting the Algorithmic Management of Science: Craft and Community After Generative AI

This essay in honor of ASQ's 70th volume surveys how technology-driven changes in scholarly publishing have introduced algorithmic management to organizational research. The internet greatly reduced the cost of publishing journals and prompted an orders-of-magnitude increase in the number of journals and articles while also foregrounding quantitative metrics for scholarship. Given the academic incentive system of publish or perish, the new online ecosystem has encouraged problematic practices by scholars and publishers that threaten the standards and values of organizational theory. The advent of generative artificial intelligence within this milieu is almost certain to worsen the publishing trends we have already experienced. Drawing on prior literature about the centrality of deep intellectual engagement through reading, writing, and interactions with colleagues, we propose a set of reforms to preserve the sacredness of craft and community at the core of our scholarly work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Science Quarterly
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392241304403
Citations
37
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resisting the Algorithmic Management of Science: Craft and Community After Generative AI

Gerald F. Davis, Beth A. Bechky
37 citations
Administrative Science Quarterly
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
41.88
article

Resisting the Algorithmic Management of Science: Craft and Community After Generative AI

Gerald F. Davis, Beth A. Bechky
article en
37 citations

Abstract

This essay in honor of ASQ's 70th volume surveys how technology-driven changes in scholarly publishing have introduced algorithmic management to organizational research. The internet greatly reduced the cost of publishing journals and prompted an orders-of-magnitude increase in the number of journals and articles while also foregrounding quantitative metrics for scholarship. Given the academic incentive system of publish or perish, the new online ecosystem has encouraged problematic practices by scholars and publishers that threaten the standards and values of organizational theory. The advent of generative artificial intelligence within this milieu is almost certain to worsen the publishing trends we have already experienced. Drawing on prior literature about the centrality of deep intellectual engagement through reading, writing, and interactions with colleagues, we propose a set of reforms to preserve the sacredness of craft and community at the core of our scholarly work.

Administrative Science QuarterlyVol. 70(1)
University of Michigan (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
41.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resisting the Algorithmic Management of Science: Craft and Community After Generative AI — Gerald F. Davis, Beth A. Bechky · Administrative Science Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS