Alliances, state preferences, and trade networks: The impact of United States sanctions on dual-use trade

Export controls on dual-use commodities are crucial to US foreign policy goals. Research finds that US sanctions motivate third-party compliance with export controls. However, the sanctions-busting literature suggests that allies are more likely than non-allies to sabotage US sanctioning efforts. We argue that US allies export more controlled dual-use goods (CDU) when the importer is not facing US sanctions. However, US allies will not export more CDU than non-allies to US-sanctioned states. We also argue that US sanctions condition the impact of economic and political determinants of CDU trade. We find support in models spanning 1997–2015.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942241298496
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alliances, state preferences, and trade networks: The impact of United States sanctions on dual-use trade

Yuleng Zeng, Timothy M. Peterson
3 citations
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.39
article

Alliances, state preferences, and trade networks: The impact of United States sanctions on dual-use trade

Yuleng Zeng, Timothy M. Peterson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Export controls on dual-use commodities are crucial to US foreign policy goals. Research finds that US sanctions motivate third-party compliance with export controls. However, the sanctions-busting literature suggests that allies are more likely than non-allies to sabotage US sanctioning efforts. We argue that US allies export more controlled dual-use goods (CDU) when the importer is not facing US sanctions. However, US allies will not export more CDU than non-allies to US-sanctioned states. We also argue that US sanctions condition the impact of economic and political determinants of CDU trade. We find support in models spanning 1997–2015.

Conflict Management and Peace ScienceVol. 42(6)
University of Groningen (NL), Arizona State University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.