Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, Random Forest, and LSTM Models for Mercedes-Benz Stock Price Prediction

In the financial markets, accurate stock price forecasting is essential, especially for well-known companies like Mercedes-Benz. The effectiveness of three models in forecasting Mercedes-Benz stock prices is compared in this study: Random Forest (RF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Autoregressive Integral Sliding Average (ARIMA). The analysis uses historical stock data from 2000 to 2023, applying feature engineering techniques such as simple moving averages to enhance model accuracy. Long-term dependencies are modeled using RF, complicated non-linear interactions are identified using ARIMA, and linear trends are found using LSTM. Mean Square Error (MSE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) are used to evaluate the models. Results reveal that the RF model outperforms the others in short-term price forecasting, while the LSTM model excels in predicting long-term trends. The ARIMA model, though simple, struggles with volatility in turbulent market conditions. These results highlight the potential of cutting-edge machine learning models in financial forecasting and improve decision-making processes, providing insightful information for investors and financial experts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18718
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, Random Forest, and LSTM Models for Mercedes-Benz Stock Price Prediction

Wenjie Wang
1 citations
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.10
article

Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, Random Forest, and LSTM Models for Mercedes-Benz Stock Price Prediction

Wenjie Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the financial markets, accurate stock price forecasting is essential, especially for well-known companies like Mercedes-Benz. The effectiveness of three models in forecasting Mercedes-Benz stock prices is compared in this study: Random Forest (RF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Autoregressive Integral Sliding Average (ARIMA). The analysis uses historical stock data from 2000 to 2023, applying feature engineering techniques such as simple moving averages to enhance model accuracy. Long-term dependencies are modeled using RF, complicated non-linear interactions are identified using ARIMA, and linear trends are found using LSTM. Mean Square Error (MSE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) are used to evaluate the models. Results reveal that the RF model outperforms the others in short-term price forecasting, while the LSTM model excels in predicting long-term trends. The ARIMA model, though simple, struggles with volatility in turbulent market conditions. These results highlight the potential of cutting-edge machine learning models in financial forecasting and improve decision-making processes, providing insightful information for investors and financial experts.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 134(1)
University of Warwick (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, Random Forest, and LSTM Models for Mercedes-Benz Stock Price Prediction — Wenjie Wang · Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS