Robust evaluation of longitudinal surrogate markers with censored data

The development of statistical methods to evaluate surrogate markers is an active area of research. In many clinical settings, the surrogate marker is not simply a single measurement but is instead a longitudinal trajectory of measurements over time, e.g. fasting plasma glucose measured every 6 months for 3 years. In general, available methods developed for the single-surrogate setting cannot accommodate a longitudinal surrogate marker. Furthermore, many of the methods have not been developed for use with primary outcomes that are time-to-event outcomes and/or subject to censoring. In this paper, we propose robust methods to evaluate a longitudinal surrogate marker in a censored time-to-event outcome setting. Specifically, we propose a method to define and estimate the proportion of the treatment effect on a censored primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on a longitudinal surrogate marker measured up to time <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:math> . We accommodate both potential censoring of the primary outcome and of the surrogate marker. A simulation study demonstrates a good finite-sample performance of our proposed methods. We illustrate our procedures by examining repeated measures of fasting plasma glucose, a surrogate marker for diabetes diagnosis, using data from the diabetes prevention programme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkae119
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust evaluation of longitudinal surrogate markers with censored data

Denis Agniel, Layla Parast
2 citations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.13
article

Robust evaluation of longitudinal surrogate markers with censored data

Denis Agniel, Layla Parast
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The development of statistical methods to evaluate surrogate markers is an active area of research. In many clinical settings, the surrogate marker is not simply a single measurement but is instead a longitudinal trajectory of measurements over time, e.g. fasting plasma glucose measured every 6 months for 3 years. In general, available methods developed for the single-surrogate setting cannot accommodate a longitudinal surrogate marker. Furthermore, many of the methods have not been developed for use with primary outcomes that are time-to-event outcomes and/or subject to censoring. In this paper, we propose robust methods to evaluate a longitudinal surrogate marker in a censored time-to-event outcome setting. Specifically, we propose a method to define and estimate the proportion of the treatment effect on a censored primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on a longitudinal surrogate marker measured up to time <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:math> . We accommodate both potential censoring of the primary outcome and of the surrogate marker. A simulation study demonstrates a good finite-sample performance of our proposed methods. We illustrate our procedures by examining repeated measures of fasting plasma glucose, a surrogate marker for diabetes diagnosis, using data from the diabetes prevention programme.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Vol. 87(3)
RAND Corporation (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.