FEATURES OF REMOVAL OF STABLE FEMORAL STEMS OF HIP ENDOPROSTHESES

The increase in the number of primary arthroplasty procedures has led to an increase in revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection and fractures of hip stems. The problem of removing stable stems remains relevant, as the lack of a unified approach leads to an increase in the duration of operations, an increased risk of complications and worsening of treatment outcomes. Objective. To review the existing methods and find out the most optimal approaches to the removal of stable stems of hip arthroplasties of different types of fixation. Methods. A systematic literature review was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science for the period 1986–2023. 28 publications were analyzed. The authors’ own clinical experience was used (171 revision interventions from 2013 to 2024). Results. The method of removal depends on the type of fixation and design of the endoprosthesis stem. The main methods are: use of special instruments, window osteotomy, extended proximal osteotomy, transfemoral osteotomy. The choice of method depends on the specific situation, starting with the least traumatic approach. Conclusions. Removal of stable stems requires an individual approach and careful planning. Cemented polished stems are usually easier to remove, but there may be difficulties with the removal of the cement mantle. Cementless stems with distal fixation often require more aggressive methods. The choice of method should be based on the principle of minimal trauma, taking into account the possibility of further revision arthroplasty. It is recommended to have several alternative surgical plans. The proposed methodology of intraoperative actions allows optimizing the decision-making process, which contributes to improving the results of revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872024495-104
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FEATURES OF REMOVAL OF STABLE FEMORAL STEMS OF HIP ENDOPROSTHESES

Stanislav Bondarenko, Volodymyr Filipenko, Оleksey Marushchak, Yevgen Olinkevych
ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

FEATURES OF REMOVAL OF STABLE FEMORAL STEMS OF HIP ENDOPROSTHESES

Stanislav Bondarenko, Volodymyr Filipenko, Оleksey Marushchak, Yevgen Olinkevych
article en

Abstract

The increase in the number of primary arthroplasty procedures has led to an increase in revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection and fractures of hip stems. The problem of removing stable stems remains relevant, as the lack of a unified approach leads to an increase in the duration of operations, an increased risk of complications and worsening of treatment outcomes. Objective. To review the existing methods and find out the most optimal approaches to the removal of stable stems of hip arthroplasties of different types of fixation. Methods. A systematic literature review was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science for the period 1986–2023. 28 publications were analyzed. The authors’ own clinical experience was used (171 revision interventions from 2013 to 2024). Results. The method of removal depends on the type of fixation and design of the endoprosthesis stem. The main methods are: use of special instruments, window osteotomy, extended proximal osteotomy, transfemoral osteotomy. The choice of method depends on the specific situation, starting with the least traumatic approach. Conclusions. Removal of stable stems requires an individual approach and careful planning. Cemented polished stems are usually easier to remove, but there may be difficulties with the removal of the cement mantle. Cementless stems with distal fixation often require more aggressive methods. The choice of method should be based on the principle of minimal trauma, taking into account the possibility of further revision arthroplasty. It is recommended to have several alternative surgical plans. The proposed methodology of intraoperative actions allows optimizing the decision-making process, which contributes to improving the results of revision hip arthroplasty.

ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

FEATURES OF REMOVAL OF STABLE FEMORAL STEMS OF HIP ENDOPROSTHESES — Stanislav Bondarenko, Volodymyr Filipenko, et al. · ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS