Investigating User Perceptions of Collaborative Agenda Setting in Virtual Health Counseling Session

Virtual health counselors offer the potential to provide users with information and counseling in complex areas such as disease management and health education. However, ensuring user engagement is challenging, particularly when the volume of information and length of counseling sessions increase. Agenda setting—–a clinical counseling technique where a patient and clinician collaboratively decide on session topics—–is an effective approach to tailoring discussions for individual patient needs and sustaining engagement. We explore the effectiveness of agenda setting in a virtual counselor system designed to counsel women for breast cancer genetic testing. In a between-subjects study, we assessed three versions of the system with varying levels of user control in the system’s agenda setting approach. We found that participants’ knowledge improved across all conditions. Although our results showed that any type of agenda setting was perceived as useful, regardless of user control, interviews revealed a preference for more collaboration and user involvement in the agenda setting process. Our study highlights the importance of using patient-centered approaches, such as tailored discussions, when using virtual counselors in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3652988.3673956
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating User Perceptions of Collaborative Agenda Setting in Virtual Health Counseling Session

Timothy Bickmore, Hye Sun Yun, Mina Fallah, Farnaz Nouraei
1 citations
AI in Service Interactions
0.35
article

Investigating User Perceptions of Collaborative Agenda Setting in Virtual Health Counseling Session

Timothy Bickmore, Hye Sun Yun, Mina Fallah, Farnaz Nouraei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Virtual health counselors offer the potential to provide users with information and counseling in complex areas such as disease management and health education. However, ensuring user engagement is challenging, particularly when the volume of information and length of counseling sessions increase. Agenda setting—–a clinical counseling technique where a patient and clinician collaboratively decide on session topics—–is an effective approach to tailoring discussions for individual patient needs and sustaining engagement. We explore the effectiveness of agenda setting in a virtual counselor system designed to counsel women for breast cancer genetic testing. In a between-subjects study, we assessed three versions of the system with varying levels of user control in the system’s agenda setting approach. We found that participants’ knowledge improved across all conditions. Although our results showed that any type of agenda setting was perceived as useful, regardless of user control, interviews revealed a preference for more collaboration and user involvement in the agenda setting process. Our study highlights the importance of using patient-centered approaches, such as tailored discussions, when using virtual counselors in healthcare.

Northeastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
AI in Service Interactions
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating User Perceptions of Collaborative Agenda Setting in Virtual Health Counseling Session — Timothy Bickmore, Hye Sun Yun, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS