Effect of enclosure design with composite/nano-enhanced/dual phase change material on melting response of latent heat storage systems

This numerical work employs the Enthalpy-Porosity methodology to examine the melting behaviour in variously shaped enclosures (of equal area) utilized in the latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) units integrated with the phase change material (PCM). Systems of single PCM (n-Octadecane), dual PCM (n-Octadecane as PCM 1 and Capric acid as PCM 2), nano-enhanced PCM (n-Octadecane embedded with the multi-walled CNTs), and composite PCM (n-Octadecane embedded with Cu metal foam) have been compared under 11 distinct enclosure geometries subject to the uniform heat flux of 500 W/m 2 . The Prandtl numbers ( Pr ) were determined as 57.1 for liquid PCM 1 and 41.8 for liquid PCM 2. Under the studied parameters, the Grashof number ( Gr ) ranged from 0.55 × 10 5 to 5.03 × 10 5 and the Stefan number ( Ste ) valued from 0.44 to 0.76, providing key insights into the heat transfer and phase change dynamics of the system. Initial findings reveal a uniform melting rate across all the geometries dominated by the conductive heat transfer . Over time, as the natural convection overshadows conduction, the horizontal rectangular geometry exhibits the fastest melting and thus emerges as the most efficient thermal energy storage system . Notably, in the dual PCM systems, the arrangement of PCM 1 within PCM 2 (configuration-1) suppresses the melting of PCM 2 until its melting point is reached and proves to be the superior to the configuration-2 (i.e., allocation of PCM 2 within PCM 1) where the simultaneous melting of both PCMs is seen. The incorporation of both the multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and copper metal foam (MF) into PCM matrix significantly boosts the thermal conductivity thereby accelerating the melting rates across all the enclosure shapes with the horizontal rectangle performing the best. • Effect of 11 distinct enclosure shapes on melting response of PCM is studied. • Single, dual, composite, and nano-enhanced PCM systems are considered. • Results are compared for enclosures with constant area and constant perimeter. • Horizontal rectangular geometry emerges as the most efficient TES unit. • Addition of both MWCNT and Cu metal foam accelerates the melting rate.