Planning Human-Robot Co-Manipulation With Human Motor Control Objectives and Multi-Component Reaching Strategies

For successful goal-directed human-robot interaction, the robot should adapt to the intentions and actions of the collaborating human. This can be supported by musculoskeletal or data-driven human models, where the former are limited to lower-level functioning such as ergonomics, and the latter have limited generalizability or data efficiency. What is missing, is the inclusion of human motor control models that can provide generalizable human behavior estimates and integrate into robot planning methods. We use well-studied models from human motor control based on the speed-accuracy and cost-benefit trade-offs to plan collaborative robot motions. In these models, the human trajectory minimizes an objective function, a formulation we adapt to numerical trajectory optimization. This can then be extended with constraints and new variables to realize collaborative motion planning and goal estimation. We deploy this model, as well as a multi-component movement strategy, in physical collaboration with uncertain goal-reaching and synchronized motion tasks, showing the ability of the approach to produce human-like trajectories over a range of conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3522760
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning Human-Robot Co-Manipulation With Human Motor Control Objectives and Multi-Component Reaching Strategies

Kevin Haninger, Luka Peternel
1 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Robot Manipulation and Learning
0.33
article

Planning Human-Robot Co-Manipulation With Human Motor Control Objectives and Multi-Component Reaching Strategies

Kevin Haninger, Luka Peternel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For successful goal-directed human-robot interaction, the robot should adapt to the intentions and actions of the collaborating human. This can be supported by musculoskeletal or data-driven human models, where the former are limited to lower-level functioning such as ergonomics, and the latter have limited generalizability or data efficiency. What is missing, is the inclusion of human motor control models that can provide generalizable human behavior estimates and integrate into robot planning methods. We use well-studied models from human motor control based on the speed-accuracy and cost-benefit trade-offs to plan collaborative robot motions. In these models, the human trajectory minimizes an objective function, a formulation we adapt to numerical trajectory optimization. This can then be extended with constraints and new variables to realize collaborative motion planning and goal estimation. We deploy this model, as well as a multi-component movement strategy, in physical collaboration with uncertain goal-reaching and synchronized motion tasks, showing the ability of the approach to produce human-like trajectories over a range of conditions.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 10(2)
Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology (DE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Planning Human-Robot Co-Manipulation With Human Motor Control Objectives and Multi-Component Reaching Strategies — Kevin Haninger, Luka Peternel · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS