A Comparison of Research for Machine Learning Approaches for Fetal Health Prediction

Forecasting fetal health is essential for spotting issues throughout pregnancy. However, complicated data is often a challenge for conventional statistical techniques to cope with. This study used a publicly accessible fetal health dataset and optimized the dataset through preprocessing steps such as removing outliers, selecting relevant features, and normalizing the data. Subsequently, four models, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), lasso logistic regression (LLR), and neural network (NN), were selected to train the data. The results showed that the RF model performed best with an accuracy of 0.9494. The NN model performed the worst with an accuracy of 0.8752. At the same time, the results showed that RF can handle small datasets, provide feature importance, and resist overfitting. However, all models in this study have inherent limitations. Future research should focus on combining multiple models and using larger and more diverse datasets to further improve the prediction performance and effectiveness of clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/9az7vk94
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Research for Machine Learning Approaches for Fetal Health Prediction

Shuqi Wu
Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

A Comparison of Research for Machine Learning Approaches for Fetal Health Prediction

Shuqi Wu
article en

Abstract

Forecasting fetal health is essential for spotting issues throughout pregnancy. However, complicated data is often a challenge for conventional statistical techniques to cope with. This study used a publicly accessible fetal health dataset and optimized the dataset through preprocessing steps such as removing outliers, selecting relevant features, and normalizing the data. Subsequently, four models, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), lasso logistic regression (LLR), and neural network (NN), were selected to train the data. The results showed that the RF model performed best with an accuracy of 0.9494. The NN model performed the worst with an accuracy of 0.8752. At the same time, the results showed that RF can handle small datasets, provide feature importance, and resist overfitting. However, all models in this study have inherent limitations. Future research should focus on combining multiple models and using larger and more diverse datasets to further improve the prediction performance and effectiveness of clinical applications.

Highlights in Science Engineering and TechnologyVol. 123
King's College London (GB), King's College School (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.