EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF WASTE SORTING BY WASTE PICKERS AT THE FINAL PROCESSING SITE TPA SARI MUKTI

At the Sari Mukti Landfill, the reduction in the volume of waste entering the final processing is achieved through landfill management, composting, and sorting. The sorting that has been carried out so far is done by scavengers. Based on data and studies conducted at the landfill, it was concluded that the sorting efficiency, on average, between January and February is 0.81%. This efficiency of 0.81% was obtained from sorting in 5% of zones B and C, with a total of 385 scavengers. If we apply the same efficiency to 100% of the area, the number of scavengers required would be 7,700. However, the results of the study do not recommend increasing the number of scavengers. Instead, it is recommended to sort waste at the source. With the sorting mechanisms outlined in the discussion, it is hoped that only a small portion of organic waste will enter the landfill.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AL ULUM JURNAL SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31602/jst.v10i3.16792
Primary Topic
Waste Management and Recycling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF WASTE SORTING BY WASTE PICKERS AT THE FINAL PROCESSING SITE TPA SARI MUKTI

Endang Supraptiah, Sri Murda Niati, Gemala Cahya, Idha Silviyati
AL ULUM JURNAL SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
Waste Management and Recycling
article

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF WASTE SORTING BY WASTE PICKERS AT THE FINAL PROCESSING SITE TPA SARI MUKTI

Endang Supraptiah, Sri Murda Niati, Gemala Cahya, Idha Silviyati
article en

Abstract

At the Sari Mukti Landfill, the reduction in the volume of waste entering the final processing is achieved through landfill management, composting, and sorting. The sorting that has been carried out so far is done by scavengers. Based on data and studies conducted at the landfill, it was concluded that the sorting efficiency, on average, between January and February is 0.81%. This efficiency of 0.81% was obtained from sorting in 5% of zones B and C, with a total of 385 scavengers. If we apply the same efficiency to 100% of the area, the number of scavengers required would be 7,700. However, the results of the study do not recommend increasing the number of scavengers. Instead, it is recommended to sort waste at the source. With the sorting mechanisms outlined in the discussion, it is hoped that only a small portion of organic waste will enter the landfill.

AL ULUM JURNAL SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGIVol. 10(3)
Sriwijaya University (ID)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Waste Management and Recycling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF WASTE SORTING BY WASTE PICKERS AT THE FINAL PROCESSING SITE TPA SARI MUKTI — Endang Supraptiah, Sri Murda Niati, et al. · AL ULUM JURNAL SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS