Catalyzing strategy: guidelines for better strategy and strategic thinking

Purpose VUCA times are pressuring senior executives more than ever to find pathways to growth, reinvention, and innovation. Strategy continues to be a primary tool in the toolkit, and yet execution is regularly rated as poor, and strategy is often misunderstood and misaligned. The article identifies patterns and symptoms of poor strategy processes and structures, and highlights successful approaches to activating strategy by breaking down barriers, communicating strategy more effectively, and creating the conditions for strategic thinking to permeate the organization. Design/methodology/approach This article usefully highlights trends in approaches to the strategy process and strategic practices, drawn from a range of recent robust surveys of thousands of senior strategists, CEOs, and senior executive teams across industries, sectors, continents. It also integrates examples and insights gleaned from applied strategy consulting engagements across industries, and curates contemporary examples from an array of sectors. Findings Most strategy execution is ineffective, slow, and misunderstood. Many strategy processes and structures do not overcome bureaucracy and misalignment, and many organizations lose sight of the links between mission, purpose, and strategy. Higher performing organizations invest in communicating strategy and purpose extensively, deploy dedicated strategy teams at multiple altitudes, and make strategy and strategic thinking a routine practice that informs decision-making (not a static, annual exercise). Originality/value Through succinct examples drawn from an array of industries and the distillation of a range of survey results of strategists and senior executives/CEOs, this paper identifies patterns and symptoms of poor strategy and poor strategic thinking, highlights examples of good strategic thinking and processes, and proposes practical guidelines for improvement to catalyze strategy and strategic thinking throughout an organization. The insights are relevant to an array of organizations, large, medium and small, across industries and sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategy and Leadership
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-05-2024-0048
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Business Strategies and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catalyzing strategy: guidelines for better strategy and strategic thinking

Michael K. Allio
2 citations
Strategy and Leadership
Business Strategies and Innovation
1.11
article

Catalyzing strategy: guidelines for better strategy and strategic thinking

Michael K. Allio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose VUCA times are pressuring senior executives more than ever to find pathways to growth, reinvention, and innovation. Strategy continues to be a primary tool in the toolkit, and yet execution is regularly rated as poor, and strategy is often misunderstood and misaligned. The article identifies patterns and symptoms of poor strategy processes and structures, and highlights successful approaches to activating strategy by breaking down barriers, communicating strategy more effectively, and creating the conditions for strategic thinking to permeate the organization. Design/methodology/approach This article usefully highlights trends in approaches to the strategy process and strategic practices, drawn from a range of recent robust surveys of thousands of senior strategists, CEOs, and senior executive teams across industries, sectors, continents. It also integrates examples and insights gleaned from applied strategy consulting engagements across industries, and curates contemporary examples from an array of sectors. Findings Most strategy execution is ineffective, slow, and misunderstood. Many strategy processes and structures do not overcome bureaucracy and misalignment, and many organizations lose sight of the links between mission, purpose, and strategy. Higher performing organizations invest in communicating strategy and purpose extensively, deploy dedicated strategy teams at multiple altitudes, and make strategy and strategic thinking a routine practice that informs decision-making (not a static, annual exercise). Originality/value Through succinct examples drawn from an array of industries and the distillation of a range of survey results of strategists and senior executives/CEOs, this paper identifies patterns and symptoms of poor strategy and poor strategic thinking, highlights examples of good strategic thinking and processes, and proposes practical guidelines for improvement to catalyze strategy and strategic thinking throughout an organization. The insights are relevant to an array of organizations, large, medium and small, across industries and sectors.

Strategy and LeadershipVol. 53(1)
Providence College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Business Strategies and Innovation
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Catalyzing strategy: guidelines for better strategy and strategic thinking — Michael K. Allio · Strategy and Leadership (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS