Resilience of Machine Learning Models in Anxiety Detection: Assessing the Impact of Gaussian Noise on Wearable Sensors

The resilience of machine learning models for anxiety detection through wearable technology was explored. The effectiveness of feature-based and end-to-end machine learning models for anxiety detection was evaluated under varying conditions of Gaussian noise. By adding synthetic Gaussian noise to a well-known open access affective states dataset collected with commercially available wearable devices (WESAD), a performance baseline was established using the original dataset. This was followed by an examination of the impact of noise on model accuracy to better understand model performance (F1-score and Accuracy) changes as a function of noise. The results of the analysis revealed that with the increase in noise, the performance of feature-based models dropped from a high of 90% F1-score and 92% accuracy to 65% and 70%, respectively; while end-to-end models showed a decrease from an 85% F1-score and 87% accuracy to below 60% and 65%, respectively. This indicated a proportional decline in performance across both feature-based and end-to-end models as noise levels increased, challenging initial assumptions about model resilience. This analysis highlights the need for more robust algorithms capable of maintaining accuracy in noisy, real-world environments and emphasizes the importance of considering environmental factors in the development of wearable anxiety detection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010088
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience of Machine Learning Models in Anxiety Detection: Assessing the Impact of Gaussian Noise on Wearable Sensors

Richard B. Sowers, Manuel E. Hernandez, Jean L. Clore, Abdulrahman Alkurdi et al.
6 citations
Applied Sciences
Emotion and Mood Recognition
3.05
article

Resilience of Machine Learning Models in Anxiety Detection: Assessing the Impact of Gaussian Noise on Wearable Sensors

Richard B. Sowers, Manuel E. Hernandez, Jean L. Clore, Abdulrahman Alkurdi, Elizabeth T. Hsiao‐Wecksler
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The resilience of machine learning models for anxiety detection through wearable technology was explored. The effectiveness of feature-based and end-to-end machine learning models for anxiety detection was evaluated under varying conditions of Gaussian noise. By adding synthetic Gaussian noise to a well-known open access affective states dataset collected with commercially available wearable devices (WESAD), a performance baseline was established using the original dataset. This was followed by an examination of the impact of noise on model accuracy to better understand model performance (F1-score and Accuracy) changes as a function of noise. The results of the analysis revealed that with the increase in noise, the performance of feature-based models dropped from a high of 90% F1-score and 92% accuracy to 65% and 70%, respectively; while end-to-end models showed a decrease from an 85% F1-score and 87% accuracy to below 60% and 65%, respectively. This indicated a proportional decline in performance across both feature-based and end-to-end models as noise levels increased, challenging initial assumptions about model resilience. This analysis highlights the need for more robust algorithms capable of maintaining accuracy in noisy, real-world environments and emphasizes the importance of considering environmental factors in the development of wearable anxiety detection systems.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Illinois College (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
3.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.