Texture Perception and Chewing of Agar Gel by People with Different Sensitivity to Hardness

Hardness is one of the dominant sensory characteristics of food. This study estimated the effect of sensitivity to hardness on the texture perception and chewing function using 2, 4, and 6% agar gels. Increasing the concentration of agar resulted in an increase in gel hardness and springiness, measured by texture profile analysis. Non-trained participants (<i>n</i> = 95) reported more subjective hardness and springiness during chewing gel samples as the agar concentration increased. Based on the relationship value of the instrumental and sensory data, all participants were divided into low-, medium-, and high-sensitivity groups (<i>n</i> = 25, 44, and 26). Low sensitivity to hardness was associated with low sensitivity to brittleness, springiness, chewiness, moisture, and swallowability. In all three groups, enhanced agar gel hardness increased the temporal chewing characteristics in a similar manner. However, in those with a high hardness sensitivity, the area amplitude of the masseter and temporalis muscles grew to a lesser extent than in those with a low or medium sensitivity. The activity of the suprahyoid muscles increased with the increasing agar gel hardness, regardless of sensitivity. All groups showed a similar salivation and bolus fragmentation while chewing gel. Thus, people's sensitivity to hardness was associated with different perceptions of the gel's textural properties and changes in masticatory muscle activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gels
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11010005
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Botanical Research and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Texture Perception and Chewing of Agar Gel by People with Different Sensitivity to Hardness

В. В. Смирнов, Elizaveta Chistiakova, Daria S. Khramova, Fedor Vityazev et al.
9 citations
Gels
Botanical Research and Applications
3.14
article

Texture Perception and Chewing of Agar Gel by People with Different Sensitivity to Hardness

В. В. Смирнов, Elizaveta Chistiakova, Daria S. Khramova, Fedor Vityazev, Sergey V. Popov, Natalya V. Zueva, Inga Velskaya
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Hardness is one of the dominant sensory characteristics of food. This study estimated the effect of sensitivity to hardness on the texture perception and chewing function using 2, 4, and 6% agar gels. Increasing the concentration of agar resulted in an increase in gel hardness and springiness, measured by texture profile analysis. Non-trained participants (<i>n</i> = 95) reported more subjective hardness and springiness during chewing gel samples as the agar concentration increased. Based on the relationship value of the instrumental and sensory data, all participants were divided into low-, medium-, and high-sensitivity groups (<i>n</i> = 25, 44, and 26). Low sensitivity to hardness was associated with low sensitivity to brittleness, springiness, chewiness, moisture, and swallowability. In all three groups, enhanced agar gel hardness increased the temporal chewing characteristics in a similar manner. However, in those with a high hardness sensitivity, the area amplitude of the masseter and temporalis muscles grew to a lesser extent than in those with a low or medium sensitivity. The activity of the suprahyoid muscles increased with the increasing agar gel hardness, regardless of sensitivity. All groups showed a similar salivation and bolus fragmentation while chewing gel. Thus, people's sensitivity to hardness was associated with different perceptions of the gel's textural properties and changes in masticatory muscle activity.

GelsVol. 11(1)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute of Geology, Komi Science Centre (RU)
Russian Academy of Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Botanical Research and Applications
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.