Leveraging Autofluorescence for Tumor Detection, Diagnosis, and Accurate Excision with Surgical Margin Assessment in Tumor Excision

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Oral cancer ranks among the top ten cancers globally, with a five-year survival rate below 50%. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of autofluorescence-guided surgery compared to standard surgical methods in identifying tumor-free margins and ensuring complete excision. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort of 80 patients was randomized into two groups: the control group underwent excision with a 10 mm margin based on clinical judgment, while the experimental group used autofluorescence guidance with a 5 mm margin beyond fluorescence visualization loss. Autofluorescence imaging was performed using the OralID device, which employs a 405 nm excitation laser to detect abnormal tissue. Ethical approval was obtained from the "Spitalul Clinic Municipal de Urgență Timișoara" Ethics Committee (approval number 08/26.02.2021), and the trial was registered at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara (trial no. 59/25.11.2021). A double analysis was conducted: a primary analysis of the full cohort and a subgroup analysis focusing on squamous cell carcinoma (control: <i>n</i> = 19; experimental: <i>n</i> = 24). Histopathological analysis was the gold standard for margin evaluation, with margins coded as tumor-free margins (0), close (1), or infiltrated (2). <b>Results:</b> Statistically significant differences were observed in tumor-free margins between the control (73.17%) and experimental (97%) groups (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Subgroup analysis for SCC showed no significant difference (control: 84.21%; experimental: 95.83%; <i>p</i> = 0.306). Tumor location also differed significantly <i>(p</i> = 0.011), while other baseline variables, such as tumor type and patient characteristics, showed no significant differences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Autofluorescence-guided surgery improves the detection of tumor-free margins and may serve as an effective adjunct in oral cancer management. Larger studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13010010
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Autofluorescence for Tumor Detection, Diagnosis, and Accurate Excision with Surgical Margin Assessment in Tumor Excision

Antonis Perdiou, Atena Găluşcan, Dacian Virgil Lalescu, Ruxandra Sava-Roşianu et al.
3 citations
Dentistry Journal
Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
1.26
article

Leveraging Autofluorescence for Tumor Detection, Diagnosis, and Accurate Excision with Surgical Margin Assessment in Tumor Excision

Antonis Perdiou, Atena Găluşcan, Dacian Virgil Lalescu, Ruxandra Sava-Roşianu, Octavia Bălean, Daniela Jumanca, Ramona Dumitrescu, Şerban Talpoş
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Oral cancer ranks among the top ten cancers globally, with a five-year survival rate below 50%. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of autofluorescence-guided surgery compared to standard surgical methods in identifying tumor-free margins and ensuring complete excision. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort of 80 patients was randomized into two groups: the control group underwent excision with a 10 mm margin based on clinical judgment, while the experimental group used autofluorescence guidance with a 5 mm margin beyond fluorescence visualization loss. Autofluorescence imaging was performed using the OralID device, which employs a 405 nm excitation laser to detect abnormal tissue. Ethical approval was obtained from the "Spitalul Clinic Municipal de Urgență Timișoara" Ethics Committee (approval number 08/26.02.2021), and the trial was registered at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara (trial no. 59/25.11.2021). A double analysis was conducted: a primary analysis of the full cohort and a subgroup analysis focusing on squamous cell carcinoma (control: <i>n</i> = 19; experimental: <i>n</i> = 24). Histopathological analysis was the gold standard for margin evaluation, with margins coded as tumor-free margins (0), close (1), or infiltrated (2). <b>Results:</b> Statistically significant differences were observed in tumor-free margins between the control (73.17%) and experimental (97%) groups (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Subgroup analysis for SCC showed no significant difference (control: 84.21%; experimental: 95.83%; <i>p</i> = 0.306). Tumor location also differed significantly <i>(p</i> = 0.011), while other baseline variables, such as tumor type and patient characteristics, showed no significant differences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Autofluorescence-guided surgery improves the detection of tumor-free margins and may serve as an effective adjunct in oral cancer management. Larger studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(1)
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.