Animal as the Solution II: Phenotyping for Low Milk Urea Nitrogen A1PF Dairy Cows

The societal pressure on intensive pastoral dairying demands the search for strategies to reduce the amount of N flowing through and excreted by dairy cows. One of the strategies that is being currently explored focuses on the animal as a solution, as there are differences in N metabolism between cows even within the same herd. This work was conducted to explore such an approach in A1PF herds in New Zealand and the possibility of identifying A1PF cows that are divergent for milk urea nitrogen (MUN) concentration through phenotyping as a potential viable strategy to reduce N leaching and emissions from temperate dairy systems. Three herd tests were conducted to select a population sample of 200 cows (exhibiting the lowest 100 and highest 100 MUN concentrations). Milk samples were collected from the 200 cows during mid and late lactation to test for milk solids content and MUN. From the 200 cows, urine for urinary N concentration (UN), blood for plasma urea N, total antioxidants (TAS), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were collected from the 20 extremes (the lowest 10 and highest 10 MUN concentrations). Milk urea N was greater in cows selected as high-MUN cows (16.2 vs. 14.32 ± 0.23 mg/dL) and greater during late lactation (16.9 vs. 13.0 ± 0.19 mg/dL). Milk solids and fat content were 38% and 20% greater in cows selected as low-MUN cows than in high-MUN cows during mid lactation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Low-MUN cows had lower UN than high-MUN cows during mid lactation (0.64 vs. 0.88 ± 0.11%). The N concentration in the plasma (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and Tas (<i>p</i> = 0.06) were greater during late lactation. There was a positive relationship between the MUN concentration phenotype used for selection and the MUN concentration for the trial period and MUN concentration and UN concentration during mid and late lactation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Our results suggest that A1PF cows within a commercial herd can be phenotyped and selected for low-MUN, which may be potentially a viable strategy to reduce N losses to the environment and create healthier systems. Following genetic tracking, those cows can be bred to further promote low-MUN A1PF herds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15010032
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Animal as the Solution II: Phenotyping for Low Milk Urea Nitrogen A1PF Dairy Cows

Anita Fleming, Sagara N. Kumara, Fabiellen Cristina Pereira, Shu Zhan Lai et al.
Animals
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Animal as the Solution II: Phenotyping for Low Milk Urea Nitrogen A1PF Dairy Cows

Anita Fleming, Sagara N. Kumara, Fabiellen Cristina Pereira, Shu Zhan Lai, Pablo Gregorini, E. D. WILSON
article en

Abstract

The societal pressure on intensive pastoral dairying demands the search for strategies to reduce the amount of N flowing through and excreted by dairy cows. One of the strategies that is being currently explored focuses on the animal as a solution, as there are differences in N metabolism between cows even within the same herd. This work was conducted to explore such an approach in A1PF herds in New Zealand and the possibility of identifying A1PF cows that are divergent for milk urea nitrogen (MUN) concentration through phenotyping as a potential viable strategy to reduce N leaching and emissions from temperate dairy systems. Three herd tests were conducted to select a population sample of 200 cows (exhibiting the lowest 100 and highest 100 MUN concentrations). Milk samples were collected from the 200 cows during mid and late lactation to test for milk solids content and MUN. From the 200 cows, urine for urinary N concentration (UN), blood for plasma urea N, total antioxidants (TAS), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were collected from the 20 extremes (the lowest 10 and highest 10 MUN concentrations). Milk urea N was greater in cows selected as high-MUN cows (16.2 vs. 14.32 ± 0.23 mg/dL) and greater during late lactation (16.9 vs. 13.0 ± 0.19 mg/dL). Milk solids and fat content were 38% and 20% greater in cows selected as low-MUN cows than in high-MUN cows during mid lactation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Low-MUN cows had lower UN than high-MUN cows during mid lactation (0.64 vs. 0.88 ± 0.11%). The N concentration in the plasma (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and Tas (<i>p</i> = 0.06) were greater during late lactation. There was a positive relationship between the MUN concentration phenotype used for selection and the MUN concentration for the trial period and MUN concentration and UN concentration during mid and late lactation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Our results suggest that A1PF cows within a commercial herd can be phenotyped and selected for low-MUN, which may be potentially a viable strategy to reduce N losses to the environment and create healthier systems. Following genetic tracking, those cows can be bred to further promote low-MUN A1PF herds.

AnimalsVol. 15(1)
Lincoln University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.