DETERMINANTS OF AUDITOR’S ABILITY TO DETECT FRAUD

The study aims to provide empirical evidence on the effect of work experience, professional scepticism and time pressure on the ability of auditors to detect fraud. This research uses quantitative research methods that use statistical analysis tools, namely using Smart PLS (Partial Least Square) software. The data used is primary and comes directly from those surveyed, using a questionnaire designed to collect it. The questionnaires were distributed through the provision of paper questionnaires and through Google forms that were sent directly to the respondents. Sample in this study were 33 auditors in Medan City. The results of this study indicate that work experience positively affects the auditor's ability to detect fraud, while professional scepticism and time pressure do not affect the auditor's ability to detect fraud. Keywords : Ability to Detect Fraud, Professional Skepticism, Time Pressure, Work Experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kajian Akuntansi
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29313/kajian_akuntansi.v25i2.4610
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DETERMINANTS OF AUDITOR’S ABILITY TO DETECT FRAUD

Deliana Deliana, Mohd Faizal Jamaludin, Eka Nurmala Sari, Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman et al.
3 citations
Kajian Akuntansi
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

DETERMINANTS OF AUDITOR’S ABILITY TO DETECT FRAUD

Deliana Deliana, Mohd Faizal Jamaludin, Eka Nurmala Sari, Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman, Rizki Syahputra, Sadaukur Aeroki Purba
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The study aims to provide empirical evidence on the effect of work experience, professional scepticism and time pressure on the ability of auditors to detect fraud. This research uses quantitative research methods that use statistical analysis tools, namely using Smart PLS (Partial Least Square) software. The data used is primary and comes directly from those surveyed, using a questionnaire designed to collect it. The questionnaires were distributed through the provision of paper questionnaires and through Google forms that were sent directly to the respondents. Sample in this study were 33 auditors in Medan City. The results of this study indicate that work experience positively affects the auditor's ability to detect fraud, while professional scepticism and time pressure do not affect the auditor's ability to detect fraud. Keywords : Ability to Detect Fraud, Professional Skepticism, Time Pressure, Work Experience.

Kajian AkuntansiVol. 25(2)
State University of Medan (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (ID), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DETERMINANTS OF AUDITOR’S ABILITY TO DETECT FRAUD — Deliana Deliana, Mohd Faizal Jamaludin, et al. · Kajian Akuntansi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS