How Reliable Is Environmental Management in Mining? Learnings Through Analysis of Sustainability Reports

ABSTRACT Environmental failures associated with mining operations are persistent issues. It is therefore surprising that we still know very little about whether companies are taking the organisational steps necessary to reliably achieve acceptable environmental performance. Companies use sustainability reports to describe their progress towards fulfilling environmental commitments. This study examines sustainability reports published by seven of the largest mining companies through the lens of High Reliability Organisation (HRO) theory and considers what those reports reveal about the reliability of mining company environmental activities. We conclude the extent to which environmental management practices align with HRO characteristics cannot be determined with certainty from sustainability reports. The data does suggest an insufficient embedding of environmental management in organisational collective mindsets, as well as other significant gaps in the application of HRO hallmark characteristics to environmental activities. Alternative data sources need to be explored to determine the reliability of environmental management in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Reliable Is Environmental Management in Mining? Learnings Through Analysis of Sustainability Reports

Layla Howe, Claire M. Côte, Susan J Johnston
1 citations
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Mining and Resource Management
0.27
article

How Reliable Is Environmental Management in Mining? Learnings Through Analysis of Sustainability Reports

Layla Howe, Claire M. Côte, Susan J Johnston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Environmental failures associated with mining operations are persistent issues. It is therefore surprising that we still know very little about whether companies are taking the organisational steps necessary to reliably achieve acceptable environmental performance. Companies use sustainability reports to describe their progress towards fulfilling environmental commitments. This study examines sustainability reports published by seven of the largest mining companies through the lens of High Reliability Organisation (HRO) theory and considers what those reports reveal about the reliability of mining company environmental activities. We conclude the extent to which environmental management practices align with HRO characteristics cannot be determined with certainty from sustainability reports. The data does suggest an insufficient embedding of environmental management in organisational collective mindsets, as well as other significant gaps in the application of HRO hallmark characteristics to environmental activities. Alternative data sources need to be explored to determine the reliability of environmental management in practice.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 32(2)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Queensland Resources Council
Life in Land, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Mining and Resource Management
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.