Membership in meta-organizations between organizational membership and inter-organizational relationship. A three-logics model to assess the heterogeneity of meta-organizations and variations among them

In this paper, we advance a specific understanding of concept of logic of membership in a meta-organizational setting by building on the literature on organizational membership and pinpointing how membership in meta-organizations theoretically connects to the dual nature of meta-organizations as organizational entities and as patterns of inter-organizational relationships. On this basis, we develop and present a new analytical tool aiming at assessing the heterogeneity of meta-organizations and at providing a novel theoretical account of variations among them. This framework is based on the characterization of three fundamental logics of membership, which relate to the fundamental nature of the inter-organizational relationship that connects a member organization to a meta-organization: (1) the logic of service (members as clients and meta-organizations as service providers) pertains to a market-type form of relationship; (2) the logic of representation (members as represented constituents and meta-organizations as representative intermediaries) pertains to a principal-agent form; and (3) the logic of coordination (members as collaborative partners and meta-organizations as structures of inter-organizational coordination) pertains to a collaborative form. We argue that distinguishing between these three logics of membership is important because each affects the very nature of meta-organizations and has very different (meta-)organizational implications, which also means that the source of differentiation highlighted by our three-logics model can shed important light on core issues of the theory of meta-organizations. • Membership in MOs is both an associational special status and a pattern of inter-organizational relationship. • Our three-logics model highlights three interconnected logics of membership in MOs. • The logic of service (members as clients) relates to a market-type relationship. • The logic of representation (members as constituents) relates to a principal-agent relationship. • The logic of coordination (members as partners) relates to a collaborative relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Management
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101394
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Membership in meta-organizations between organizational membership and inter-organizational relationship. A three-logics model to assess the heterogeneity of meta-organizations and variations among them

Pierre Garaudel
2 citations
Scandinavian Journal of Management
Innovation and Knowledge Management
1.11
article

Membership in meta-organizations between organizational membership and inter-organizational relationship. A three-logics model to assess the heterogeneity of meta-organizations and variations among them

Pierre Garaudel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we advance a specific understanding of concept of logic of membership in a meta-organizational setting by building on the literature on organizational membership and pinpointing how membership in meta-organizations theoretically connects to the dual nature of meta-organizations as organizational entities and as patterns of inter-organizational relationships. On this basis, we develop and present a new analytical tool aiming at assessing the heterogeneity of meta-organizations and at providing a novel theoretical account of variations among them. This framework is based on the characterization of three fundamental logics of membership, which relate to the fundamental nature of the inter-organizational relationship that connects a member organization to a meta-organization: (1) the logic of service (members as clients and meta-organizations as service providers) pertains to a market-type form of relationship; (2) the logic of representation (members as represented constituents and meta-organizations as representative intermediaries) pertains to a principal-agent form; and (3) the logic of coordination (members as collaborative partners and meta-organizations as structures of inter-organizational coordination) pertains to a collaborative form. We argue that distinguishing between these three logics of membership is important because each affects the very nature of meta-organizations and has very different (meta-)organizational implications, which also means that the source of differentiation highlighted by our three-logics model can shed important light on core issues of the theory of meta-organizations. • Membership in MOs is both an associational special status and a pattern of inter-organizational relationship. • Our three-logics model highlights three interconnected logics of membership in MOs. • The logic of service (members as clients) relates to a market-type relationship. • The logic of representation (members as constituents) relates to a principal-agent relationship. • The logic of coordination (members as partners) relates to a collaborative relationship.

Scandinavian Journal of ManagementVol. 41(1)
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.