Coordination of COVID-19 pandemic response measures at the territorial level

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that triggered the COVID-19 pandemic, has caused approximately 20 million deaths and has created global chaos, highlighting the importance of efficient coordination of public health measures to limit spread and reduce impact on healthcare systems and society. Th e study focused on analyzing existing literature using PubMed, ScienceDirect (Elsevier) and search engine Google Academic, considering sources published between 2020 and 2023. Studies have emphasized that early intervention, digital technology use for effective coordination, active community involvement, and efficient collaboration among agencies are crucial in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Relevant data analysis has shown that success in reducing the pandemic’s impact significantly depends on citizens’ trust in their governments. For example, while South Korea managed the pandemic without severe restrictive measures, relying on trust in authorities, New Zealand adopted restrictive measures and effective strategies of clear and transparent communication to efficiently respond to the pandemic’s evolution. In contrast, in regions like Mexico and Brazil, where pandemic management was characterized by deficiencies and shortcomings, high levels of infection, mortality, and morbidity were recorded. Th ese comparisons underscore the importance of well-defined strategies in combating a global health crisis. Coordinated public health measures have been decisive in managing the spread of COVID-19. Th e research highlights the need for effective communication channels, flexible strategies, and determined leadership to optimize public health responses in the context of future pandemics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Economy and Management in Medicine
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52556/2587-3873.2024.4(101).01
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coordination of COVID-19 pandemic response measures at the territorial level

Daniela Demişcan
Public Health Economy and Management in Medicine
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Coordination of COVID-19 pandemic response measures at the territorial level

Daniela Demişcan
article en

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that triggered the COVID-19 pandemic, has caused approximately 20 million deaths and has created global chaos, highlighting the importance of efficient coordination of public health measures to limit spread and reduce impact on healthcare systems and society. Th e study focused on analyzing existing literature using PubMed, ScienceDirect (Elsevier) and search engine Google Academic, considering sources published between 2020 and 2023. Studies have emphasized that early intervention, digital technology use for effective coordination, active community involvement, and efficient collaboration among agencies are crucial in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Relevant data analysis has shown that success in reducing the pandemic’s impact significantly depends on citizens’ trust in their governments. For example, while South Korea managed the pandemic without severe restrictive measures, relying on trust in authorities, New Zealand adopted restrictive measures and effective strategies of clear and transparent communication to efficiently respond to the pandemic’s evolution. In contrast, in regions like Mexico and Brazil, where pandemic management was characterized by deficiencies and shortcomings, high levels of infection, mortality, and morbidity were recorded. Th ese comparisons underscore the importance of well-defined strategies in combating a global health crisis. Coordinated public health measures have been decisive in managing the spread of COVID-19. Th e research highlights the need for effective communication channels, flexible strategies, and determined leadership to optimize public health responses in the context of future pandemics.

Public Health Economy and Management in Medicine(4(101))
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coordination of COVID-19 pandemic response measures at the territorial level — Daniela Demişcan · Public Health Economy and Management in Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS