Comprehensive benchmarking of computational tools for predicting toxicokinetic and physicochemical properties of chemicals

Ensuring the safety of chemicals for environmental and human health involves assessing physicochemical (PC) and toxicokinetic (TK) properties, which are crucial for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET). Computational methods play a vital role in predicting these properties, given the current trends in reducing experimental approaches, especially those that involve animal experimentation. In the present manuscript, twelve software tools implementing Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were selected for the prediction of 17 relevant PC and TK properties. A total of 41 validation datasets were collected from the literature, curated and used for assessing the models' external predictivity, emphasizing the performance of the models inside the applicability domain. Overall, the results confirmed the adequate predictive performance of the majority of the selected tools, with models for PC properties (R<sup>2</sup> average = 0.717) generally outperforming those for TK properties (R<sup>2</sup> average = 0.639 for regression, average balanced accuracy = 0.780 for classification). Notably, several of the tools evaluated exhibited good predictivity across different properties and were identified as recurring optimal choices. Moreover, a systematic analysis of the chemical space covered by the external validation datasets confirmed the validity of the collected results for relevant chemical categories (e.g., drugs and industrial chemicals), further increasing the confidence in the overall evaluation. The best performing models were ultimately suggested for each investigated property and proposed as robust computational tools for high-throughput assessment of highly relevant chemical properties. SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: The present manuscript provides an overview of the state-of-the-art available computational tools for predicting the PC and TK properties of chemicals. The results here offer valuable guidance to researchers, regulatory authorities, and the industry in identifying robust computational tools suitable for predicting relevant chemical properties in the context of chemical design, toxicity and environmental fate assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-024-00931-z
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive benchmarking of computational tools for predicting toxicokinetic and physicochemical properties of chemicals

Domenico Gadaleta, Marina García de Lomana, Rafael Gozalbes, Emilio Benfenati et al.
10 citations
Journal of Cheminformatics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.61
article

Comprehensive benchmarking of computational tools for predicting toxicokinetic and physicochemical properties of chemicals

Domenico Gadaleta, Marina García de Lomana, Rafael Gozalbes, Emilio Benfenati, Alessandra Roncaglioni, Eva Serrano‐Candelas, Erika Colombo, Rita Ortega-Vallbona, Giada Biava, Pablo Aparicio-Sánchez
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Ensuring the safety of chemicals for environmental and human health involves assessing physicochemical (PC) and toxicokinetic (TK) properties, which are crucial for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET). Computational methods play a vital role in predicting these properties, given the current trends in reducing experimental approaches, especially those that involve animal experimentation. In the present manuscript, twelve software tools implementing Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were selected for the prediction of 17 relevant PC and TK properties. A total of 41 validation datasets were collected from the literature, curated and used for assessing the models' external predictivity, emphasizing the performance of the models inside the applicability domain. Overall, the results confirmed the adequate predictive performance of the majority of the selected tools, with models for PC properties (R<sup>2</sup> average = 0.717) generally outperforming those for TK properties (R<sup>2</sup> average = 0.639 for regression, average balanced accuracy = 0.780 for classification). Notably, several of the tools evaluated exhibited good predictivity across different properties and were identified as recurring optimal choices. Moreover, a systematic analysis of the chemical space covered by the external validation datasets confirmed the validity of the collected results for relevant chemical categories (e.g., drugs and industrial chemicals), further increasing the confidence in the overall evaluation. The best performing models were ultimately suggested for each investigated property and proposed as robust computational tools for high-throughput assessment of highly relevant chemical properties. SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: The present manuscript provides an overview of the state-of-the-art available computational tools for predicting the PC and TK properties of chemicals. The results here offer valuable guidance to researchers, regulatory authorities, and the industry in identifying robust computational tools suitable for predicting relevant chemical properties in the context of chemical design, toxicity and environmental fate assessment.

Journal of CheminformaticsVol. 16(1)
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT), Guardia Civil (ES), Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Bayer (Germany) (DE)
European Commission
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.