Effect of Single, Accumulated, and Conventional Walking on Glucose Level, Aerobic Capacity, Fatigue, and Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of different walking protocols on various physiological and psychological factors in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods: In this randomized study, 45 individuals with T2D, aged 55–65 years, with diabetes duration between 1 and 10 years were recruited. They were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: single walking (SW), accumulated walking (AW), or conventional walking (CW). The primary outcome measure was fasting blood glucose (FBG) while secondary outcomes assessed were 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), fatigue, and quality of life (QoL). Intervention was given for 6 weeks. Intra-group changes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, while inter-group differences were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: 42 participants completed the study. The baseline data showed non-significant difference across the groups for age and duration of diabetes. FBG showed a minor reduction in the SW (12%) and AW (15.5%) groups, while it increased in the CW group (2.5%). The 6MWD improved significantly in the SW (21.3%, p = 0.003) and AW (21%, p = 0.008) groups, but decreased in the CW (9.5%) group. Fatigue decreased in the SW (4.5%, p = 0.027) and AW (4.8%, p = 0.003) groups, while it slightly increased in the CW (0.5%) group. QoL improved in the SW (2.3%, p = 0.016) and AW (4.3%, p = 0.008) groups but decreased in the CW (1.78%) group. Post-hoc analysis showed significant differences in 6MWD (p = 0.010) and QoL (p = 0.008) between the AW and CW groups. Conclusions: SW and AW showed similar effects on glucose levels, aerobic capacity, fatigue, and QoL. However, AW is more effective than CW in enhancing aerobic capacity and QoL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Diabetology
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/cd.102291
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Single, Accumulated, and Conventional Walking on Glucose Level, Aerobic Capacity, Fatigue, and Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Suroshree Mitra, Apurv Shimpi, Shreya G. Mendon
Clinical Diabetology
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Effect of Single, Accumulated, and Conventional Walking on Glucose Level, Aerobic Capacity, Fatigue, and Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Suroshree Mitra, Apurv Shimpi, Shreya G. Mendon
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of different walking protocols on various physiological and psychological factors in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods: In this randomized study, 45 individuals with T2D, aged 55–65 years, with diabetes duration between 1 and 10 years were recruited. They were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: single walking (SW), accumulated walking (AW), or conventional walking (CW). The primary outcome measure was fasting blood glucose (FBG) while secondary outcomes assessed were 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), fatigue, and quality of life (QoL). Intervention was given for 6 weeks. Intra-group changes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, while inter-group differences were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: 42 participants completed the study. The baseline data showed non-significant difference across the groups for age and duration of diabetes. FBG showed a minor reduction in the SW (12%) and AW (15.5%) groups, while it increased in the CW group (2.5%). The 6MWD improved significantly in the SW (21.3%, p = 0.003) and AW (21%, p = 0.008) groups, but decreased in the CW (9.5%) group. Fatigue decreased in the SW (4.5%, p = 0.027) and AW (4.8%, p = 0.003) groups, while it slightly increased in the CW (0.5%) group. QoL improved in the SW (2.3%, p = 0.016) and AW (4.3%, p = 0.008) groups but decreased in the CW (1.78%) group. Post-hoc analysis showed significant differences in 6MWD (p = 0.010) and QoL (p = 0.008) between the AW and CW groups. Conclusions: SW and AW showed similar effects on glucose levels, aerobic capacity, fatigue, and QoL. However, AW is more effective than CW in enhancing aerobic capacity and QoL.

Clinical DiabetologyVol. 13(6)
Sancheti Institute For Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.