Mathematical Reasoning Activity: Compare, Generalize and Justify

The significance of mathematical reasoning skills is often highlighted in national and international curricula. In recent years, the process aspect of mathematical reasoning has been examined through comparison, generalization, and justification. Emphasizing these process abilities is crucial for creating learning settings that develop mathematical thinking and enhance teacher's understanding. This study assessed middle school students' comparation, generalization, and justification within reasoning activities. The participants were 27 sixth-grade students engaged in a mathematical reasoning workshop. The research data were gathered via a reasoning activity including three open-ended sub-problems addressed by the students. The data were analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that middle school students were capable of comparison, although they had difficulties in generalization and justification. Upon comprehensive evaluation, it was concluded that the number of students who completed these three steps cohesively was considerably low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1506921
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical Reasoning Activity: Compare, Generalize and Justify

Zeynep ÇİFTCİ, Tuba Öz
2 citations
Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
4.19
article

Mathematical Reasoning Activity: Compare, Generalize and Justify

Zeynep ÇİFTCİ, Tuba Öz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The significance of mathematical reasoning skills is often highlighted in national and international curricula. In recent years, the process aspect of mathematical reasoning has been examined through comparison, generalization, and justification. Emphasizing these process abilities is crucial for creating learning settings that develop mathematical thinking and enhance teacher's understanding. This study assessed middle school students' comparation, generalization, and justification within reasoning activities. The participants were 27 sixth-grade students engaged in a mathematical reasoning workshop. The research data were gathered via a reasoning activity including three open-ended sub-problems addressed by the students. The data were analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that middle school students were capable of comparison, although they had difficulties in generalization and justification. Upon comprehensive evaluation, it was concluded that the number of students who completed these three steps cohesively was considerably low.

Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi DergisiVol. 18(2)
Atatürk University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mathematical Reasoning Activity: Compare, Generalize and Justify — Zeynep ÇİFTCİ, Tuba Öz · Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS