A COMBINED APPROACH TO THE REMOVAL OF METALLIC FOREIGN BODIES FROM SOFT TISSUES

Introduction. The ongoing hostilities in Ukraine have led to a significant number of victims with gunshot wounds. A distinguishing characteristic of modern firearms and explosive weapons is the impact of projectiles that cause injuries in the form of fragments, bullets, secondary and tertiary shrapnel, and other foreign bodies (e.g., glass, plastic, soil, or clothing remnants) that remain embedded in the victim's tissues. Shrapnel wounds account for 56.7% of all combat injuries. The treatment of gunshot and bullet wounds focuses on the removal of foreign bodies and the restoration of the anatomical and physiological integrity of the affected tissues. However, there is currently no standardized approach to the removal of such foreign bodies. The objective of this study was to enhance outcomes in the removal of metallic foreign bodies by employing a combined method during repeated surgical wound treatment. Participants and methods. The study involved two research groups. The first group (Group I) consisted of 191 wounded individuals whose metal fragments were removed using the traditional method with magnetic instruments. The second group (Group II) included 173 patients whose foreign bodies were removed using a combination of a mobile X-ray unit and ultrasound guidance. Results. The findings demonstrated that the combined method for removing foreign bodies offers significant advantages over the traditional approach. The combined method increased the removal efficiency by 20.6%. Intraoperative complications were 5.2 times less frequent in Group II compared to Group I (1.7% vs. 8.9%). Postoperative pain levels, measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), were significantly lower in Group II (4.5 ± 0.32) compared to Group I (7.5 ± 0.3). Additionally, the combined method effectively minimized the risk of inflammatory processes and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications. These results highlight the combined method as a superior approach for the removal of metallic foreign bodies, improving both surgical outcomes and patient recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.24.4.52
Primary Topic
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMBINED APPROACH TO THE REMOVAL OF METALLIC FOREIGN BODIES FROM SOFT TISSUES

D.М. Ivashchenko, M.I. Kravtsiv, M.P. Shevchuk, G.O. Ivanova et al.
Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
article

A COMBINED APPROACH TO THE REMOVAL OF METALLIC FOREIGN BODIES FROM SOFT TISSUES

D.М. Ivashchenko, M.I. Kravtsiv, M.P. Shevchuk, G.O. Ivanova, Dudchenko Ma, T.V. Horodova –Andrieieva
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The ongoing hostilities in Ukraine have led to a significant number of victims with gunshot wounds. A distinguishing characteristic of modern firearms and explosive weapons is the impact of projectiles that cause injuries in the form of fragments, bullets, secondary and tertiary shrapnel, and other foreign bodies (e.g., glass, plastic, soil, or clothing remnants) that remain embedded in the victim's tissues. Shrapnel wounds account for 56.7% of all combat injuries. The treatment of gunshot and bullet wounds focuses on the removal of foreign bodies and the restoration of the anatomical and physiological integrity of the affected tissues. However, there is currently no standardized approach to the removal of such foreign bodies. The objective of this study was to enhance outcomes in the removal of metallic foreign bodies by employing a combined method during repeated surgical wound treatment. Participants and methods. The study involved two research groups. The first group (Group I) consisted of 191 wounded individuals whose metal fragments were removed using the traditional method with magnetic instruments. The second group (Group II) included 173 patients whose foreign bodies were removed using a combination of a mobile X-ray unit and ultrasound guidance. Results. The findings demonstrated that the combined method for removing foreign bodies offers significant advantages over the traditional approach. The combined method increased the removal efficiency by 20.6%. Intraoperative complications were 5.2 times less frequent in Group II compared to Group I (1.7% vs. 8.9%). Postoperative pain levels, measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), were significantly lower in Group II (4.5 ± 0.32) compared to Group I (7.5 ± 0.3). Additionally, the combined method effectively minimized the risk of inflammatory processes and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications. These results highlight the combined method as a superior approach for the removal of metallic foreign bodies, improving both surgical outcomes and patient recovery.

Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академіїVol. 24(4)
Poltava V.G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University (UA), Poltava State Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.