AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE GOLD STANDARD IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA CARDIA

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of treatment for achalasia cardia by Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy. Subjects and methods. To conduct a comparative assessment of the results of treatment of patients with achalasia cardia by Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy, we analyzed the results of treatment of 65 (100.0%) patients who received the treatment at the Multidisciplinary Surgical Department of the National Medical Center «University Clinic» of the Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmaceutical University and Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital for 2019–2023. The postoperative observation period was one year. The postoperative follow-up period lasted one year. For a comparative assessment of treatment outcomes, all 65 patients (100.0%) were divided into two groups: group A consisted of 30 patients (46.2%) who underwent surgical treatment using the laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication technique; group B included 35 patients (53.8%) treated using the peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) method. Results. Analysis of treatment outcomes for achalasia cardia based on the Eckardt scale demonstrated significant effectiveness in both groups. In the Heller myotomy group, the score decreased from 7.6 ± 1.1 before surgery to 3.3 ± 0.4 after surgery (p < 0.0001, U = 466.0). Similarly, in the peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) group, the score decreased from 7.8 ± 0.7 before surgery to 3.0 ± 0.4 after surgery (p < 0.0001, U = 492.0). These results indicate the equivalent effectiveness of both methods (p = 0.8032, U = 785.0). In the Heller myotomy group, recurrences were observed in 2 patients (6.7%), while in the POEM group, 2 cases (5.7%) of reflux esophagitis were detected post-treatment. However, these results were not statistically significant in either case (p = 0.1944, U = 495.0 and p = 0.6979, U = 490.0, respectively). Conclusion Oral endoscopic myotomy is a modern and minimally traumatic method of treating achalasia cardia, which can compete with Heller cardiomyotomy and can be considered as an effective alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.24.4.301
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE GOLD STANDARD IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA CARDIA

Oleksandr Kiosov
Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE GOLD STANDARD IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA CARDIA

Oleksandr Kiosov
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of treatment for achalasia cardia by Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy. Subjects and methods. To conduct a comparative assessment of the results of treatment of patients with achalasia cardia by Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy, we analyzed the results of treatment of 65 (100.0%) patients who received the treatment at the Multidisciplinary Surgical Department of the National Medical Center «University Clinic» of the Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmaceutical University and Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital for 2019–2023. The postoperative observation period was one year. The postoperative follow-up period lasted one year. For a comparative assessment of treatment outcomes, all 65 patients (100.0%) were divided into two groups: group A consisted of 30 patients (46.2%) who underwent surgical treatment using the laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication technique; group B included 35 patients (53.8%) treated using the peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) method. Results. Analysis of treatment outcomes for achalasia cardia based on the Eckardt scale demonstrated significant effectiveness in both groups. In the Heller myotomy group, the score decreased from 7.6 ± 1.1 before surgery to 3.3 ± 0.4 after surgery (p < 0.0001, U = 466.0). Similarly, in the peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) group, the score decreased from 7.8 ± 0.7 before surgery to 3.0 ± 0.4 after surgery (p < 0.0001, U = 492.0). These results indicate the equivalent effectiveness of both methods (p = 0.8032, U = 785.0). In the Heller myotomy group, recurrences were observed in 2 patients (6.7%), while in the POEM group, 2 cases (5.7%) of reflux esophagitis were detected post-treatment. However, these results were not statistically significant in either case (p = 0.1944, U = 495.0 and p = 0.6979, U = 490.0, respectively). Conclusion Oral endoscopic myotomy is a modern and minimally traumatic method of treating achalasia cardia, which can compete with Heller cardiomyotomy and can be considered as an effective alternative.

Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академіїVol. 24(4)
Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University (UA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.