Integrating deep learning and machine learning for improved CKD-related cortical bone assessment in HRpQCT images: A pilot study

High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) offers detailed bone geometry and microarchitecture assessment, including cortical porosity, but assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD) bone images remains challenging. This proof-of-concept study merges deep learning and machine learning to 1) improve automatic segmentation, particularly in cases with severe cortical porosity and trabeculated endosteal surfaces, and 2) maximize image information using machine learning feature extraction to classify CKD-related skeletal abnormalities, surpassing conventional DXA and CT measures. We included 30 individuals (20 non-CKD, 10 stage 3 to 5D CKD) who underwent HRpQCT of the distal and diaphyseal radius and tibia and contributed data to develop and validate four different AI models for each anatomical site. Manually annotated cortical bone was used to train each segmentation deep-learning model. Textural features were extracted via Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and classified as CKD or non-CKD using XGBoost with each segmentation model. For comparison, manufacturer-supplied segmentation was used to extract cortical geometry, microarchitecture, and finite element analysis (FEA) outcomes. Model performance was confirmed using the test dataset and a separate independent validation cohort which included HRpQCT imaging from 42 additional individuals (18 non-CKD, 24 CKD stage 5D). For segmentation, the diaphyseal location showed strong performance on test datasets, with Mean IoUs of 0.96 and 0.95, and accuracies of 0.97 for both radius and tibia sites in CKD. Model 4 developed from the diaphyseal tibia region excelled in classifying test and independent validation datasets, achieving F1 scores of 0.99 and 0.96, AUCs of 0.99 and 0.94, sensitivities of 0.99, and specificities of 0.99 and 0.92. No single parameter, including BMD and cortical porosity, among conventional CT outcomes consistently differentiated CKD from non-CKD across all anatomical sites. Integrating HRpQCT with deep and machine learning, this innovative approach enables precise automatic segmentation of severely deteriorated endocortical surfaces and enhances sensitivity to CKD-related cortical bone changes compared to standard DXA and HRpQCT outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone Reports
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101821
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating deep learning and machine learning for improved CKD-related cortical bone assessment in HRpQCT images: A pilot study

Stuart J. Warden, Kenneth Y. T. Lim, Rachel K. Surowiec, Miran Lee et al.
1 citations
Bone Reports
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.18
article

Integrating deep learning and machine learning for improved CKD-related cortical bone assessment in HRpQCT images: A pilot study

Stuart J. Warden, Kenneth Y. T. Lim, Rachel K. Surowiec, Miran Lee, Sharon M. Moe, Sangjun Park, Youngjun Lee, Choongboem Seo, Sunwoo Yang, Wikum Bandara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) offers detailed bone geometry and microarchitecture assessment, including cortical porosity, but assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD) bone images remains challenging. This proof-of-concept study merges deep learning and machine learning to 1) improve automatic segmentation, particularly in cases with severe cortical porosity and trabeculated endosteal surfaces, and 2) maximize image information using machine learning feature extraction to classify CKD-related skeletal abnormalities, surpassing conventional DXA and CT measures. We included 30 individuals (20 non-CKD, 10 stage 3 to 5D CKD) who underwent HRpQCT of the distal and diaphyseal radius and tibia and contributed data to develop and validate four different AI models for each anatomical site. Manually annotated cortical bone was used to train each segmentation deep-learning model. Textural features were extracted via Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and classified as CKD or non-CKD using XGBoost with each segmentation model. For comparison, manufacturer-supplied segmentation was used to extract cortical geometry, microarchitecture, and finite element analysis (FEA) outcomes. Model performance was confirmed using the test dataset and a separate independent validation cohort which included HRpQCT imaging from 42 additional individuals (18 non-CKD, 24 CKD stage 5D). For segmentation, the diaphyseal location showed strong performance on test datasets, with Mean IoUs of 0.96 and 0.95, and accuracies of 0.97 for both radius and tibia sites in CKD. Model 4 developed from the diaphyseal tibia region excelled in classifying test and independent validation datasets, achieving F1 scores of 0.99 and 0.96, AUCs of 0.99 and 0.94, sensitivities of 0.99, and specificities of 0.99 and 0.92. No single parameter, including BMD and cortical porosity, among conventional CT outcomes consistently differentiated CKD from non-CKD across all anatomical sites. Integrating HRpQCT with deep and machine learning, this innovative approach enables precise automatic segmentation of severely deteriorated endocortical surfaces and enhances sensitivity to CKD-related cortical bone changes compared to standard DXA and HRpQCT outcomes.

Bone ReportsVol. 24
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR), Shingu College (KR), Hypertension Institute (US), Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.